So there's just too much in this thread for me to respond to, but I'm hoping that responding to some posts I'm providing enough important feedback.
I want to start with the CT went surprisingly well--because of you guys, I went in very skeptical and was ready to call it quits. But she kept echoing many of the points you've all told me and it hit hard. She felt that not only was I forgiving her too quickly, but I was trying to forgive her too early. She felt I was being far too rational about such a catastrophic event and I need to recognize that all trust in the relationship is now gone. She was also very direct with my wife that it's important for her to take full responsibility for the affair and recognize that she has deep-seated issues that need to be uncovered and discussed. She strongly reinforced that we were moving too fast--specifically me.
We both agreed to continue seeing her and are setting up a meeting for next week.
I also want to reinforce that I'm not letting various bull shit from my wife slide in our conversations and I'm not being passive. I'm leading these conversations and she is clear on how mad and hurt I am. I am reporting back her reactions as they happen, but I do not mean to imply I accept them.
She has cut all contact from the man and she wants reconciliation with me. And the only scenario I can conceive where she made additional contact with him is if he called her from a different phone yesterday (the only day we've been separated) and she deleted record of the conversation. They have an active text chain on her phone now that she hasn't deleted and his number is still blocked--more importantly though, I am 100% convinced she is not still talking with him. I think it's highly unlikely anything ever happens with him in the future, but there's no way I can know that--nor am I actively worrying about it now.
My friend, as a 100% unqualified, no formal training or education possessing armchair psychologist, I'd hazard that you are a highly co-dependent individual. At least, this post reeks of co-dependency, and a concomitant sense of passive acceptance of whatever it is she dishes up for you. El Señor, I cry for you. Out of every personality trait, co-dependency/passivity is the one single trait that is strongly correlated with failed R because of the easy ability of the WW to push an agenda of rug-sweeping, DARVO, etc.
This is a hard one to answer--objectively, we're both probably co-dependent: we've been relying on each other for 17 years.
I would note the dual references to "whore", because I find that noteworthy. A body count of 20 for an attractive woman during her undergrad years who went to college some time around the late 1990's or early aughts is not remarkable. But the fact that you perceive that she feels shame about this, that is. I wonder, does she really feel shame due to girlfriends in college, or are you projecting that? Hmmm.
I ask because you say she "became sexually repressed during our marriage". That is not something you have mentioned before in this thread. In fact, your earlier posts suggested that sex was good for the most part, and HB has been somewhat of a freak train.
When did she become "sexually repressed"? How did it manifest? That's important to know for an understanding of the dynamic.
Specifically, was it during the past year or so? I ask because one classic hallmark of cheaters is that, as they begin the walk up that ramp toward infidelity (for example, your WW trading flirty glances with Mr. Cop whilst cutting paper snowflakes at the PTA), their sexual fervor for their BS begins to wane. They become distant. Pick fights over little things. Seem irritable. The unwitting BS generally thinks he is the problem so he steps up, more acts of kindness and praise, more shouldering the domestic load, etc. But it doesn't seem to work. Where you used to feel her fire, it becomes cold inside. That, my friend, is not her becoming sexually repressed. That is the sound of her rejecting you because her Sauron's eye is now focused on the AP in the distance, the precious.
Or, was the sexual repression something different? Have you reminded her, ever, of the "whore" who screwed 20 guys in college? I do think that it's important for people to swap sexual histories before getting married, but once that's done, if you then decide to get married, sexual history is off limits in terms of fodder for shaming or abuse. Your decision to marry is a decision that you're copacetic with her history.
By the way, there are a lot of good reasons why a young 20-something woman in college might have a 20-something body count, but the most classic reason is because she can. Sex for an attractive woman in college is as readily available as air. A woman can find sex literally by stepping outside her dorm room and taking a walk down to the dining hall. If she is a serious student and a woman who wants to maintain her independence, getting into a serious boyfriend relationship can be a drag. College boys are immature, solipsistic, and possessive. Many are physically disgusting because they've not yet mastered personal hygiene. Some can become stalkers or manipulative assholes. The way to avoid all that, to keep her eye focused on her studies while slaking her 20-something sexual thirst, is to hook up with casuals and randoms. It's a logical strategy that does not deserve shame.
In contrast, if her body count was mostly illicit hook-ups with guys who were dating her friends, then she always was a shyte person and if you chose to marry her knowing this, you got what you asked for, my friend.
She fucked 20+ different guys over the first three semesters. We can disagree with if that's "a lot" for that timeframe and leave it there; however, it was well before we met and has been a significant source of scaring for her from her past. She was harshly judged by her girlfriends and began to invert sexually out of shame. I do not believe it had anything to do with me--truthfully, I liked that she was free sexually when we first met and I had no issue with her past. She just never dealt with the repressed feelings of judgement and it manifested--she thinks it's a big thing she now wants to work through in therapy.
As for our sexlife, we had very little intercourse over the last 10+ years (maybe on average, 20x a year), but we had a lot of sexual encounters, just mostly oral and hands (probably three times a week on average). But from her perspective, she didn't ever love doing it, she just went along with it--intercourse would often hurt her so non-intercourse sex was preferable to her. Truthfully, there's a lot more depth I'll have to give on our sexlife in another post.
As an aside, have you reported Officer Bangaho to his superiors for adulterous sexual intercourse? It probably violates several provisions of his code of conduct. Did he drive them from the NBA to the hotel in his squad? Probably even more violations.
They never had sexual encounters in his capacity as a police officer, as far as I know, though she did request he bring his handcuffs to the Feb. 24 hotel meetup.
I have no interest reporting him to anyone or getting involved with any inane drama. I have enough to worry about without trying to be vindictive to him.
And I'm unfamiliar with 180 therapy, but I'll look into it.
[This message edited by Drstrangelove at 9:35 PM, Wednesday, May 4th]