none of this is about the kids or you, it’s about him and his wants.
. I agree.
I’ve been through some similar shit with my eldest’s bio dad (my kid and bio dad have not spoken for nearly a decade, and it breaks my heart. Grandpa died and bio dad didn’t tell our kid that grandpa had Alzheimer’s or that he’d died… we found out from bio dad’s sister, only AFTER the death… biodad is a POS, but that’s another post lol).
I also agree to do a session with you and XWS to get an idea of things and to think about setting some boundaries/parameters. Even better is the idea that the WS would go to several sessions (maybe some with you, maybe not - he would pay and it’s up to you to participate) and IF he can show some follow thru, then consider getting DD involved. I also love the idea of having a session with DS - let DS see someone alone and then decide if he wants to lay out to his dad what HE needs - not what DAD needs.
I spent decades in the divorce biz, seen a lot of really crappy parenting, and get overly suspicious when I see this kind of thing (IOW, is dad trying to set up a motion to modify to stop child support or some other nefarious reason?). And if I had ONE thing to gripe about, it’s that the law may say "best interest of the kids", most parents and judges don’t seem to really "get" that. They dont seem to understand just how damn DAMAGING it is for a kid to be told "daddy will be here for you at 5" and have daddy not show, not call, or regularly cancel/be late, etc. BEST way to show a kid they do not matter… they are invisible… they are unimportant (and I do apologize to the dads, but IME over decades is this was 75-90% the dads who pulled that crap). No matter what the family situation is - intact, S, D, blended, whatever - Follow thru is CRUCIAL to a child’s development (IMO/IME, even more than the "frequent and meaningful contact" with both parents stuff). Ok, sorry about my t/j vent.
You can also do some sessions with XWS and then approach DD, while giving DD full veto power to do a session with dad (but I may consider requiring her to do at least one session with the IC or you and the IC).
ALL of this also requires a REALLY solid IC who does this kind of family reunification work. You may want to call your D atty and see if s/he has any recommendations, ask around, etc. Every state is different, but finding someone that has done custody disputes or worked as a guardian in custody cases may be good. Some of them are just "about" reunification at any cost, which I don’t think really works, so beware on that front, get references, etc.
And if you start with a session with you and XWS, ask about that kind of thing - what does the IC think about reunification, how do they work to create and implement goals, how do they deal with a reluctant kid, do they think any parent should force a kid to see the other one? What do those boundaries look like (eg if dad is a no show or is routinely cancelling, does a kid STILL have to set dates / make plans, or can they have their boundary of "no, I wont’ make any more plans with you bc it screws up my life and my schedule, and creates anxiety and makes me feel invisible and unimportant?). How do they hold the less functional parent’s feet to the fire?
While it sounds as if your DD may already have this part "down pat", I also think that trying to look at is as an opportunity to support a child through creating / holding boundaries, and holding others accountable can be a positive thing. It may turn out great… and it may cause a lot of heartbreak (which NO parent wants to see), but as we’ve all learned the hard way, out of heartbreak can come great learning and change. And, even if a kid has it "down" at 13, doesn’t mean they won’t need to have some solid tools in the next few years (like dating… ugh! )
[This message edited by gmc94 at 7:08 AM, Monday, January 10th]