Cookies are required for login or registration. Please read and agree to our cookie policy to continue.

Newest Member: Ali13t

General :
Is your SO's sexual history any of your business?

This Topic is Archived
default

Slowlygoingcrazy ( member #66236) posted at 1:03 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

It’s not a new shaming culture. It’s judging someone’s worth based on your own prejudices.

Say you’re dating a woman and you think she’s amazing. No red flags, you have chemistry, everything is great. Then you find out :

a) She had a threesome like 5 years ago.

b) She dated another woman back in college.

c) She’s trans.

d) She gains 10 pounds while she’s away on vacation (since for some reason weight keeps on being brought up)..

Then you dump her because you think any of these things are wrong or distasteful. You ignore everything in front of you and judge her based on that one thing. How is that not shaming her?

By the way, none of these things can be compared to committing a felony (which is illegal and harmful) and using that comparison really underscores my point here.

In the original story a man is considering ending his marriage because his wife participated in group sex. If they had a great marriage up to that point, then that’s pretty extreme. She’s not sneaking around and having group sex now. She did something with a boyfriend years before meeting her husband. Now she’s somehow tainted because of that sex act? That’s shaming.

A lot of people will dump someone for being trans. Let’s be real, it’s not about procreation (there are so many people with fertility issues for many reasons). It’s about prejudice. It’s this thought that a trans woman isn’t a real woman. That having sex with a woman who used to have male genitalia is somehow gay. Neither of those things are true. It’s a very real reaction now, but I think that future generations it won’t be a thing.

posts: 121   ·   registered: Sep. 20th, 2018
id 8474590
default

ibonnie ( member #62673) posted at 1:10 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

In the original story a man is considering ending his marriage because his wife participated in group sex. If they had a great marriage up to that point, then that’s pretty extreme. She’s not sneaking around and having group sex now. She did something with a boyfriend years before meeting her husband. Now she’s somehow tainted because of that sex act? That’s shaming.

In the original story, it's the lying that would bother me.

[This message edited by ibonnie at 7:11 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

"I will survive, hey, hey!"

posts: 2124   ·   registered: Feb. 11th, 2018
id 8474593
default

Butforthegrace ( member #63264) posted at 1:15 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Say you’re dating a woman and you think she’s amazing. No red flags, you have chemistry, everything is great. Then you find out :

a) She had a threesome like 5 years ago.

b) She dated another woman back in college.

c) She’s trans.

d) She gains 10 pounds while she’s away on vacation (since for some reason weight keeps on being brought up).

Love/bonding is personal and subjective. If your personal, subjective truth is that you don't want to be with a person who has one of those experiences or traits, then it is 100% okay to break up with them. You can't force a person to stay in a relationship because you think it's PC.

Discrimination is so widely misunderstood. When we "discriminate", we choose among people, we rank them. Each of us does this, all the time. "That guy is so hot" means that, in your view, there are other guys who are less hot.

In the employment context, if an employer has one job available, but two people apply, the employer must choose one. The employer must discriminate.

In the US, we have a history of insidious discrimination against large population groups based solely on immutable characteristics of race, religion or sex. Therefore, our legal system has said that, where the decision has an impact on economic opportunity (jobs, education, etc.), it is illegal to discriminate based on those "protected classes" of reasons.

This thinking has unfortunately led over time to an entitled snowflake mentality that it is wrong to discriminate against a person, in any context, based on some factor that might cause the discriminated-against individual to have hurt feelings. That sort of thinking is dangerous and anathema to the concept of a free society. If I don't want to date somebody because I found out she bleaches her hair blonde and I only want to date natural blondes, that is my prerogative. If I only want skinny, boyish-looking punk rock girls, then it's okay for me to tell Kim Kardashian that I'm not interested because to me she's too fat. Etc.

In the original story, it's the lying that would bother me.

Exactly, and this is exactly why people contemplating marriage should absolutely share 100% of their prior sexual history to the extent the other partner wants to know this. Sexual history is important to many people for their own personal and subjective reasons, and it tends to come out in a marriage in trickle truth fashion, over time, if not discussed/shared before marriage.

Me, personally, it would not even remotely cross my mind to divorce a wife if I learned she had group sex prior to marriage, but that is simply my personal, subjective reality. Other people feel differently, often for religious reasons. Who am I to say that my personal view is "right" compared to theirs?

[This message edited by Butforthegrace at 7:19 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

"The wicked man flees when no one chases."

posts: 4184   ·   registered: Mar. 31st, 2018   ·   location: Midwest
id 8474594
default

NorthernMSB ( member #69725) posted at 1:39 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Ok. I have stayed out of this thread even though it has disturbed me on many levels. But now I will wade in. Anything I say here is strictly my opinion and you of course can make whatever choices and have any criteria you wish for selecting partners.

Number one: my partner’s sexual history is none of my business unless it concerns STDs, illegal behaviour (children, sexual assault, animals etc). I am certainly into a lively discussion on general preferences so if my partner tells me they are interested in a particular kink like dressing up like a stuffed animal or baby, then I then can indicate my laughter in that situation might have a deflating effect on their anatomy. I believe a general compatibility in desires etc helps create a successful union. I also think a heads up about a past sexual partner in a social setting is common courtesy. My husband was indiscriminate with quantity of partners in his youth and on occasion we would be socializing in a group and there would be a few ex partners.

Number two: I am what can accurately be called a nerd. But I was a very attractive nerd and certainly could have had anyone I wanted, maybe still could if single. But, that was not my game. I was generally a serial monogamist but still managed to have sexual experience that might be frowned upon in this thread. In my current relationship and past ones I guess there is very little off the table in the bedroom. I am probably considerably more experimental than my husband and that has been an issue in our marriage. I have had a threesome (man and woman), been with women, dabbled with BDSM and tried different things over the years. I consider myself a very moral person, I have been teased because I do not break rules (don’t speed, do drugs, cut in lines. Lol). So does my experimentation mean I am somehow not pure or whatever enough for people posting here?

Number three: I actually cannot address all the various statements in this thread that have made me indignant, sad, and angry but...damn. I am left with an overwhelming sense of disappointment which hurts because I respected some of the posters and now am left somehow less. I am referring to those who seem so...judgemental, not the right word, maybe sanctimonious. And ignorant. I can say many of my own sexual encounters were generally theatre, my thing has never been me getting off. My pleasure has always been the reaction of my partner, their orgasm and their experience. That is my thing. Unless a person is engaging in activities outlined in my first point, who cares what they have done in their past? I’m going to venture most women are not enchanted by 3 or 4 guys at once but do it for their own reasons, healthy or not. I did a threesome several times with the same couple. When the dust settled, not my thing, it was distracting and I prefer lavishing my attention on one person. So does my past experience mean I should be open to a threesome now. Hard no.

Let’s assume that the original story is true, and that is a massive assumption because really? Sounds pretty fake to me...the issue is if the woman lied not her 5 way experience. Honestly because she was vocal in this supposed video does not mean she is enjoying herself. This event supposedly occurred when she was in a relationship with the boss and this guy basically set up a gangbang with his girlfriend, the power dynamics there are very questionable. She lied. Maybe because it was the worst experience in her life. Maybe all those acts committed that were not on the menu with her husband were not pleasure oriented at all and brought up bad memories. And she shouldn’t have lied but honestly? The guy in this story seems more pissed she won’t do it with him than perhaps having a candid conversation about what actually occurred.

Maybe it is because all the comments and experiences here are filtered through the lens of infidelity, both as BSs and Waywards (hate that term!). But these threads often seem to end up being a feminist/misogynist spat. Is slut shaming a real thing, damn sure it is. Have many comments here verged into the offensive. Yes. 100 percent. Do you have the right to filter your partners with whatever criteria you wish? Certainly. However, you are missing out on many many exceptional people when you apply prejudices and lists to your relationships. And let’s be really clear, saying ,that a person places less value on sex than you because you had less partners or they engaged in acts you don’t approve of is presumptuous. And it also is not an indicator of their future cheating potential. Cheaters cheat, even those who were virgins on their wedding day. It is a different subset of character.

Ok. I’m done. All my opinion but this thread seriously made me feel less safe and less positive about this site. There is enough hostility in my life and the world in general. For fuck sakes, create some positive energy whenever you can.

Me: BW-54
Him-WH-58

Too many Ddays now to count, all with the same LTAP ex-girlfriend (or I guess current) except the brief fling November 2018-Christmas Eve 2018 with another ex-girlfriend

I'm tired

posts: 496   ·   registered: Feb. 10th, 2019
id 8474598
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 1:52 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

You're right, Maudlin. I should've married the girl 32 years ago that I stopped seeing after I found out that she was with 3 guys separately in the same night a week before we started seeing each ofthe. Damn me for having a preference that doesn't fit your standard!

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8474601
default

WhoTheBleep ( member #49504) posted at 1:57 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

I can't help but think it's the video here that's the real issue. Most of us have sexual pasts. So do our spouses and SO's.

Do I want to see a VIDEO of this? Hell NO!!!

It's one thing to hear a vague story that your spouse/SO had a threesome (or a 5 some) way in the past. It's another thing to see it in a live-action video with screaming and bodily fluids etc. Come on, we are on an infidelity site. A lot of us have seen video. Or walked in on the act. We usually describe this as way more intense and painful to have to SEE it. Just like reading the text messages is worse in some cases than not reading them. New BS's are strongly cautioned before reading texts or watching video. Why? Because you cannot unsee what you have seen. (Infidelity-related or not)

I don't care if it was 10 years ago. I don't want to watch a video of my SO banging some other girl. Those mind movies would be with me forever, and would surely affect my relationship with him, and not for the better.

Lying or not, watching a video would get many people past the point of no return. Everyone's talking about lying and shaming. Let's not forget the freaking video. I honestly don't know anyone who would fully be able to get past that.

[This message edited by WhoTheBleep at 10:39 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

I believe we have two lives: the one we learn with, and the one we live with after that. --The Natural

posts: 4526   ·   registered: Sep. 6th, 2015   ·   location: USA
id 8474603
default

Slowlygoingcrazy ( member #66236) posted at 2:08 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

If your personal, subjective truth is that you don't want to be with a person who has one of those experiences or traits, then it is 100% okay to break up with them. You can't force a person to stay in a relationship because you think it's PC

I’m really not trying to say that someone has to stay in a relationship to be PC. You can break up with someone for no reason at all.

Even the guy in the original story, he should leave if he can’t get over his wife’s history. They’d probably both be happier. It’s his problem though, not because there’s something wrong with her. If his only issue is the group sex, then that is slut shaming. Doesn’t mean he has to stay in a relationship he doesn’t want to be in because that’s PC.

Another woman may choose not to date him because of his views on sex. Maybe that’s prude shaming.

In the original story the wife lied and she shouldn’t have. Maybe she doesn’t do those things anymore and answered no? Maybe she was coerced into doing it by her ex and is trying to pretend it didn’t happen? We don’t really know.

I’m hoping that in the future there won’t be, as another poster put it “consequences” for a woman’s sexual behaviour. That’s the stuff that’s rubbing me the wrong way.

posts: 121   ·   registered: Sep. 20th, 2018
id 8474604
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 2:08 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Any other "consequences" are judgments.

If that's what you want to call me not wanting a girl that did 3 guys in 8 hrs, that's fine with me.

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8474605
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 2:18 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

I will clarify as I read the story...

- Wife initiates convo about sexual history. Says she was with 4 ppl before H

- wife says she's only ever been with one person at a time. And never done anal, swallowing or facials.

- video shows that the first two points are lies (unless those were the 4 which H knew they were not)

- video shows her enjoying it immensely

- they talk about it. She admits to liking it back then. Goes on to say that in all of her previous sexual relationships and encounters that she did that stuff bc she liked it. But with H she decided to sexually calm down. And to lie about it to him.

The rest you know

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8474606
default

Loukas ( member #47354) posted at 2:19 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Any other "consequences" are judgments

I really don’t give a fuck if you think I’m judging. Just like yourself, I’ll continue to discern the rest of my life, as I should.

Maudlin, next time you and slowlygoingcrazy decide to reject any man for any reason, remember the ridiculous double standard you’ve thrown out here.

posts: 1862   ·   registered: Mar. 29th, 2015   ·   location: The school of hard knocks
id 8474608
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 2:22 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

iBonnie, Maudlin, slowlygoingcrazy...

You've never said "no" to a date request?

You've never broken up with someone for a reason other than infidelity?

[This message edited by GoldenR at 8:24 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8474609
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 2:26 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

slowlygoingcrazy said

She did something with a boyfriend years before meeting her husband.

Nope. A few months before she met her H. And with every previous sexual encounter before that.

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8474612
default

landclark ( member #70659) posted at 2:36 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

But with H she decided to sexually calm down.

And that is her right to do. She doesn’t owe her husband anything just because she has done it in the past. Is the lying ok? No, but she’s allowed to say no to those things, regardless of what she previously did. He is no way entitled to them. If he’s not ok with that, he can walk. If they’ve been married and he hasn’t been getting anal, etc., he was clearly fine with it, or willing to go without it until he found out she lied.

Me: BW Him: WH (GuiltAndShame) Dday 05/19/19 TT through AugustOne child together, 3 stepchildrenTogether 13.5 years, married 12.5

First EA 4 months into marriage. Last ended 05/19/19. *ETA, contd an ea after dday for 2 yrs.

posts: 2062   ·   registered: May. 29th, 2019
id 8474615
default

Marauder ( member #68781) posted at 2:44 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

@Maudlin

But the overweight person is seen as less than by society is STILL A PERSON.

They're less, LESS ATTRACTIVE. Both physically and as a partner. They're not "less of a person", you folks are constantly trying to equate various things to pretend people having preferences is bad and unjust.

Being overweight is less attractive, which makes them less desirable as a partner. It's very much unhealthy, it very much shows what kind of life they live, what attitude they have, and allows you to make an educated guess at other aspects of their personality such as being physically lazy/prone to overindulgence/low self-inhibition.

@ibonnie

As long as everyone in the situation is a willing, enthusiastic, consenting adult, that's honest about their situation

What the hell does that have to do with future partners seeing this as a deal-breaker? Absolutely nothing! Why do you keep bringing it up as if that somehow should force others to accept it?

@slowlygoingcrazy

How is that not shaming her?

Counter question. How is being upset for people having deal-breakers, boundaries, and things they find unacceptable. Then calling them intolerant, judgemental, close-minded, and all kinds of other nasty things not judgemental, hypocritical and projection?

a) She had a threesome like 5 years ago.

b) She dated another woman back in college.

c) She’s trans.

d) She gains 10 pounds while she’s away on vacation (since for some reason weight keeps on being brought up)..

Guess what. All of these have severe implications for the relationship going forward. It shows her values, views, morales,and what to expect of her as a partner. The same goes for a man, since you guys keep screaming about double standards.

a) Sexually promiscuous. Which in turn leads to a whole lot of other conclusions. Whether this is positive or negative depends upon the person who would date her. Finding this great is just as valid as seeing this as a deal-breaker.

b) Personally wouldn't give a damn, for others this would be a deal-breaker. Which once again, is their good right.

c) Biological males, can't have children, usually comes with a whole host of complications and issues. Personally I think people can do what they want concerning this, that doesn't mean I would or should have to date them.

d) And then s/he gains another 10, and another 10, and before long you're dating someone who is obese. It's a clear and obvious game-changer. While some of this might be due to aging, oftentimes it's a sign of the person letting themselves go, growing lazy, not putting in the effort anymore.

If they had a great marriage up to that point, then that’s pretty extreme

They clearly didn't. Since she felt the need to lie and deceive him. Otherwise, chances are they wouldn't even have gotten married. He merely got clued in later. The same argument can be made for infidelity, hell some folks regularly do!

"Sure, s/he cheated on you. But that was 5 years ago. Since then you had a great marriage. Don't throw it all away!"

You're right, Maudlin. I should've married the girl 32 years ago that I stopped seeing after I found out that she was with 3 guys separately in the same night a week before we started seeing each ofthe. Damn me for having a preference that doesn't fit your standard!

How dare you have preferences, deal-breakers, boundaries, etc. Having them is judgemental and wrong! It is demeaning and mean. You owe these people a relationship. Even though they themselves will quickly judge others as entitled, judgemental, and worse.

@Slowlygoingcrazy

If his only issue is the group sex, then that is slut-shaming.

No, slut-shaming is actively persecuting someone for something, trying to ostracize them, and have others ostracize them. If your definition of slut-shaming is a guy having any kind of boundaries, deal-breakers, etc. Then I'd feel comfortable to call that word that much hot air. As it's at that point just self-serving, hypocritical and shows a high level of entitlement.

@Loukas

I really don’t give a fuck if you think I’m judging. Just like yourself, I’ll continue to discern the rest of my life, as I should.

The hilarious thing is. They're judging you for judging them for various actions and behaviours they partook in. At this point, the only shaming that is going on seems to be self-serving buzzwords thrown at people who might exclude them from the dating pool for any reason.

I really hope they live by their own standards. Which would amount to dating and getting into a serious relationship with pretty much ANYONE who would want one. Because if they don't, they're judging that person, and shaming them.

posts: 170   ·   registered: Nov. 7th, 2018
id 8474616
default

Slowlygoingcrazy ( member #66236) posted at 2:44 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

What I’m trying to get across is as a society we shouldn’t judge women because of sex. Sex isn’t this bad thing. Women who have more adventurous aren’t somehow worse than women who don’t. That’s my issue here.

GoldenR

I’m not even saying that people aren’t allowed to date who they want. Do it. Dump people for whatever reason. If it’s because a girl had sex with 3 guys in one night then yes you’re slut shaming her. So? You seem to be ok with your choice.

To answer your question, I wouldn’t reject a guy based on his sexual past. As long as it’s legal and didn’t hurt anyone, it’s fine by me. Cheating and abuse hurt people and I wouldn’t date someone if I knew they participated that behaviour.

The key is past. I’m not a fan of group sex, so if he wants to bring that in to our relationship I wouldn’t do it. I would break up with him if he really needed group sex. We’re obviously not a good match.

I do judge people. I probably wouldn’t date a felon. You have to do something pretty extreme be a convicted felon. There are situations where I could see maybe doing it, but violent crime? Probably not.

I did dump a guy after finding out he had a heroin addiction. He wasn’t currently using, but he had a history of relapse. I didn’t want to take the risk.

I’m showing prejudice. There are wonderful people who I won’t date.

I’m sure there are people who are offended by that. Oh well? I’m not going to get upset about it.

[This message edited by Slowlygoingcrazy at 9:02 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

posts: 121   ·   registered: Sep. 20th, 2018
id 8474617
default

Incarnate ( member #46085) posted at 3:05 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Well. I have read this thread most of the way through three or four times, and each time, I ended up closing it before responding because I had reactions of anger on both sides, both those vehemently for and vehemently against requiring full disclosure.

I am going to be 100% clear. I am one of the 'vehemently for disclosure' types. I personally feel that if one cannot share the intimate details of ones life with someone, there is a block there that will inhibit a relationship in some way. Some others don't feel that way and have managed to have long and fulfilling relationships regardless, and, well, more power to them.

It has also been a point that, were it a dead horse, it would have been beaten into paste, the lying about it is the primary ethical issue. I agree. I also take a bit of personal issue with the whole "refused to do these things with me but did them willingly with others" part, but that is more of an emotional reaction and not grounded in ethics or morality, IMO. If someone doesn't have the drive to do something sexual with someone, even their partner, they shouldn't have to.

Now, to the substance of this thread.

I was a virgin when my STBXW and I first had sex, and to my understanding, so was she. I'm not sure if I 100% believe that at this point, but I don't have any direct evidence to contradict that, nor do I have any solid suspicions as to who may have been a previous first, but it is frankly neither here nor there. There was pretty much no sexual history to share. I'd fooled around with exactly three girls before her, mostly heavy petting and makeouts, but never any sex. I shared this experience when she asked in as much detail as she wanted me to with no reservation.

My STBXW has had at least four other partners since we first slept together, two of which she did not disclose for years, and two of which she did not sleep with until after she stopped sleeping with me, but before she told me we were done (her current OM and OW). I suspect at least two more, but I cannot prove it, and at this point, I am not interested in digging for proof since we are done and it is irrelevant. I have been tested for STDs and I came back completely negative across the board, so it isn't a health issue, it's an "added layers of betrayal" issue. I have enough right now, thank you, I don't need any more.

When I saw the photos that were taken of her most recent sexual odyssey, where she spent a week of threesomes with the degenerates, there were multiple things that stood out to me.

She engaged in letting the OW perform oral on her. That is one of my favorite things to do in bed, and she hasn't let me since 2013. It was a sore spot. She said that she did not enjoy it at all and didn't want to, so I did not push it.

She was on top of OM. She refused to do this with me.

She performed oral on OM and OW. She would seldom do this for me (twice in the last three years).

She engaged in DP with toys and the OM, something I had expressed strong interest in, but she refused, said she had no interest at all. Since she has come home and we are IHS, I have found multiple toys allowing her to perform it on herself that have been left in view as I go through her bedroom and into the main household.

She obviously engaged on an FMM threesome, which I had expressed a willingness to do so that she could explore her interest in women. She refused to do so with me.

I do not judge her for these acts. I would be a hypocrite if I did. I do not find the acts themselves immoral or unethical. I mean, provided it's not illegal or abusive, dude, whatever torques your pork, have fun, fuck it, who cares?

But withholding them from me when she obviously had an interest hurts. Performing them with another man and woman hurts. Seeing those pictures hurt. Lying about them hurt. Mocking me that she chose to do them with others because I was insufficient hurts. It's the lies, the deception, the dismissal, and the rejection that is the problem.

Rejection hurts. It's never fun, never positive or pleasant. I'm not saying that a person needs to never be able to reject their partner, sometimes it happens, but.. rejection hurts. When enough rejection and enough hurt and enough lies build up, that will absolutely make a person no longer suitable as a partner.

Now that I am looking for a new partner (or at least keeping my eyes open), yes, I am going to be discerning. I am going to make sure that whoever I choose is going to fit my personal criteria. I want a woman who is not obese; I do not find obese women attractive. That is my personal preference. I am open to skin tone, eye color, hair color, but right now, I find the idea of a latina woman attractive, and so am more likely to pursue a latina woman. Perhaps that's a bit of fetishization on my part, but what, should I AVOID latina women because I acknowledge I find THAt particular part of who they are (their appearance) attractive?

That's absurd. It would be like making myself go for an overweight white woman who was taller than me simply because I prefer a petite latina women who is shorter. That seems really ass backwards. I mean, I wouldn't want to be someones "choice of ethics over attraction," why should I do the same? Piss on that.

You can call it discrimination if you wish, to pick someone that fits your desires and reject someone who doesn't, you can call it prejudice not to choose someone who has traits that you find unappealing, but the fact is that we, as humans, operate on that wavelength every single day. We choose foods that we find appealing and reject ones that we find unappealing. We travel to places we find appealing and avoid places we do not. We associate with people who have traits that appeal to us, and stay away from people who have traits we find objectionable for whatever reason.

In a partner, I do not want a trans-woman. I have nothing against trans-women personally or ethically, but I do not put them into my potential partner pool for multiple reasons. I do not want an obese woman because I am not physically attracted to obese women, and I need to be attracted to my partner. I do not want a woman that is taller than me, because I like to be taller than my partner. I am not necessarily seeking a black woman because, in general, I am not attracted to black women, but I have nothing against them and if I DID meet a black woman I was attracted to and fit the rest of my criteria, I would absolutely pursue a relationship with her.

I do understand that some people can take the reaction to previous sexual history to the level of 'slut shaming,' and that is not okay. If the act itself is not immoral, then there is no reason to judge someone for something they did before they even fuckin' knew you existed. I mean, ffs, have some perspective. But honesty, openness, and intimacy are key to a successful relationship, and without that holy trinity, the relationship will suffer.

[This message edited by Incarnate at 9:11 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

Me: BH
She: EW
Divorce in progress
DD1: 11/29/14
DD2: 8/14/19

What a wicked game we play.

posts: 768   ·   registered: Dec. 26th, 2014   ·   location: Northern California
id 8474629
default

Fife ( new member #55881) posted at 3:15 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

Edit: Incarnate's post is an excellent one. I had the misfortune of composing while he was posting, and didn't read it first, but regardless...

If I'm considering a person to be wife material, you're bloody well right that her sexual history is on the table. So is a history of addiction, sexual abuse, and a myriad of other things.

If they don't like that, then they can hit the trail, with no bad feelings on my part. If they want to accuse me of "slut shaming" then They can wander off to their friends, commiserate, and start looking again for Mr. Right. I don't mind being the bad guy, even if I'm saving both of us a load of trouble.

I've always been the type to live out the axiom, "Do what you want, but don't interfere in the rights of others". I'm not going to dictate the rules of sexual behavior to anyone, just so long as it's all consensual. That doesn't mean that I'm a slave with no freewill. I get to choose who I spend my life with too.

A person who wants to do everything under the sun sexually is psychologically different from the opposite end of the spectrum, the prudish type. They're different people. One must know what they are marrying, because sex is an integral part of the marriage. I wouldn't marry the woman in the original post, nor would I marry a prude. I would marry someone close to me on the sexual spectrum. It makes it easier for her to meet my needs, and it makes it easier for me to meet hers. It's fundamental.

I subscribed to the idea that my XW's sexual history was none of my business. I thought that I knew her. My XW never brought up such things, and I never asked. I was stupid. It matters. Leave no stone unturned, or risk inadequacy and resentment.

I caught my XW in the act. I immediately set my mind up in such a way that the person that I caught was not the person that I married. I divorced this "new" person and mourned the death of the old person, but in reality, that was all a coping mechanism. She was always that way. There was no "old" and "new". If I would have taken the time to find out the real her, we would have never married to begin with. I left stones unturned. Big stones. Important stones.

She was unfaithful. That was why we divorced, but we would have never married to begin with, had I known what she truly was at that point in time. I would have saved both of us much grief and heartache if I would have asked a few questions early on, presuming that she would have answered honestly.

It took divorce, her threats of suicide, and my reluctant willingness as a betrayed and divorced spouse, to GIFT her councilling sessions after "we" were no more, to understand why she did what she did. Our marriage was dead and buried, but she was genuinely suffering from a mental illness, and so I went as a resource to her and her councilor, at their request, in the hopes that she would be whole again. Maybe not even "again". It appears that she was never really "whole".

I found out much more than I ever wanted, and my discovery of her with the pool maintenance guy was just the tip of the iceberg when it came to her sexual proclivities, but those councilling sessions kept her alive long enough to fix herself. No regrets on my part there, but very, very painful, pain that I would have never been subjected to to begin with, if I had known what she was before falling in love.

Sexual history IS your business. It is a measure of character, not necessarily good or bad character, but of the TYPE of character. If someone tells you that it's none of your business as you're both looking to move further into a relationship, then MAKE IT none of your business. Hop on your horse and ride off into the sunset. It is impossible to evaluate your potential future relationship based on this basic question of compatibility, without asking hard questions and getting honest answers.

It is my firm belief that slut shaming, in the commonly accepted sense, has ZERO purpose, especially because most who slut shame have their own problems, starting with being hypocrites in most cases.

Understanding the sexual desires of a person who you are going to potentially spend the rest of your life with, and create other lives with, is a MUST.

Like I said, if they make it none of your business, run far and fast. Who cares what they or their friends think of you for creating healthy boundaries? It's better than coming home to hell one day. I know of what I speak.

[This message edited by Fife at 9:19 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

posts: 40   ·   registered: Nov. 2nd, 2016
id 8474632
default

Marauder ( member #68781) posted at 3:38 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

@landclark

And that is her right to do. She doesn’t owe her husband anything just because she has done it in the past. Is the lying ok? No, but she’s allowed to say no to those things, regardless of what she previously did. He is no way entitled to them. If he’s not ok with that, he can walk. If they’ve been married and he hasn’t been getting anal, etc., he was clearly fine with it, or willing to go without it until he found out she lied.

Sure it's her right to do and she owes him nothing. However, the same goes for him. He owes her absolutely nothing either. Yet that part is happily omitted.

Without the lying, without the deception, if she had straight up told him "sure, I did anal, gangbangs, deep throating, etc. But you get boring once a month minimum dead fish sex!" this marriage would likely never have come to be.

He was fine with it because she led him to believe she never has done such things and never would do so. That it was the status quo and had always been. That she's simply that type of person. He was fine with it because he didn't know she had been lying to him and deceiving him all along. She'd likely never even gotten a foot in the door otherwise. And guess what, since neither owes the other anything and both have their rights, that would've been completely fine!

@Slowlygoingcrazy

Women who have more adventurous aren’t somehow worse than women who don’t.

Are they worse people? No. Nobody ever even said that. Are they worse partners, especially for people who have different values, boundaries, etc. Absolutely!

posts: 170   ·   registered: Nov. 7th, 2018
id 8474642
default

cocoplus5nuts ( member #45796) posted at 3:51 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

"That guy is so hot" means that, in your view, there are other guys who are less hot.

No, it doesn't. Where is the comparison in that statement? "That guy is so much hotter that this guy," is a comparison.

((NMSB)) 👏👏👏👏🙌 I hear you and completely agree! I can't even begin to address some of the things said here. They are just too offensive and misogynistic.

I think that a lot of men just will not understand. That's not a statement against men. There are some men who refuse to even try to understand. I think most men are not like that. However, if you haven't experienced it, it's extremely difficult to understand it. Don't we say that about infidelity all the time? If you haven't been a BP, you can't understand what it's like.

I go back to the statement, "If someone tells you they are hurt by something you said or did, you don't get to decide that's not true." A lot if people resist that idea. They will say it's not true because they did not intend to hurt anyone. (How many times have we heard that one from a cheater?)

It's not about intent. It's about how the message was received. Maybe the hurt party could grow a thicker skin. That does not negate us from looking at our contribution to their pain and seeing how we might change to avoid injuring anyone in the future.

I never intend to hurt my children. Sometimes, they are hurt by things I say or do. I don't deny their pain. I acknowledge it and apologize for what I did.

Incarnate, excellent post!

There are some fallacies in this thread. The one that is stuck on my head right now is the idea that being overweight equals unhealthy. I used to believe that until I started going through perimenopause. That is simply not true. Scientific studies have shown that being overweight does not necessarily mean that one is unhealthy.

I live what I consider to be a very healthy lifestyle. I don't smoke anything. I don't drink alcohol or use any other illicit drugs. I eat the healthiest food that I can, a variety of lots of vegetables, lean protein, healthy fats, some fruit, and I try to keep sugar to a minimum. I exercise daily. I do a strength/conditioning workout 6 days a week, and practice and teach yoga every day.

Guess what? I am not within my supposed ideal weight range or BMI (which has been shown to be very inaccurate, btw). I am considered somewhere in between overweight and obese. I weigh 147 pounds. I was never overweight in my past. Before turning 43, I easily kept myself below 120 pounds while eating and doing whatever I wanted (all the desserts and alcohol). I was extremely unhealthy.

Recently, I had my annual physical. My blood pressure is excellent. My blood tests were all within normal, healthy ranges. I don't have heart problems or diabetes or any other chronic disease (except depression). I don't take any meds except my antidepressants. I am much healthier than the average American. My fch is not overweight. He has to maintain a certain BMI for his job. He follows pretty much the same healthy lifestyle as I do. Some may say, even healthier because he consumes less sugar and caffeine than I do. He has had borderline high blood pressure years despite all of the healthy things he does to try to lower it.

Yet, some of you would not consider dating me because you assume that I must be a fat, lazy slob because of how I look. That is judgemental and shaming. It's not the same as not dating me because you don't find me attractive. I don't find overweight men attractive.

I could go on and on. My point is that it may be time to rethink some of the "truths" that we have been programmed to believe. Nothing is that simple.

Edited because I hit the submit button by accident.

[This message edited by cocoplus5nuts at 10:19 AM, November 29th (Friday)]

Me(BW): 1970WH(caveman): 1970Married June, 2000DDay#1 June 8, 2014 EADDay#2 12/05/14 confessed to sex before polygraphStatus: just living my life

posts: 6919   ·   registered: Dec. 1st, 2014   ·   location: Virginia
id 8474647
default

Buzzy ( member #72001) posted at 4:12 PM on Friday, November 29th, 2019

I regard to the "I did it for him/them but I am not doing it for you" would be a tough one to take for most men.

So Bill and Zoe have been married for 15 years, they are doing ok but the house needs major renovation and the cars are getting old but they mostly get by and are happy, Bill is left £200, 000 pounds by his Uncle, it wasn't expected but very welcome. Bill spends the money on a new car for himself and holiday for him and two friends, new golf kit etc. Zoe complains about this but Bill says "you were happy to scrape by before i received MY money so whats the problem"?

Same with a spouse saying you were happy with our sex life before you discovered my past.

Also known as Discord, a dramatic troll.

posts: 212   ·   registered: Nov. 4th, 2019   ·   location: London
id 8474657
This Topic is Archived
Cookies on SurvivingInfidelity.com®

SurvivingInfidelity.com® uses cookies to enhance your visit to our website. This is a requirement for participants to login, post and use other features. Visitors may opt out, but the website will be less functional for you.

v.1.001.20251009a 2002-2025 SurvivingInfidelity.com® All Rights Reserved. • Privacy Policy