I realize that I am constantly making assumptions about people around me every day. I can't get in their heads, so I have no real idea what they are thinking or how they feel. It sounds stupid, but that was kind of a revelation to me.
Knowing so little about the person you are supposed to be closest to kind of freaks me out. Somehow makes me feel vulnerable.
A1, I think a lot of this gets to Mindfulness.
Imagine that you are at the center and there are concentric rings go further and further out from you. Those rings are your relationships. The closet are your most intimate, strongest relationships. Longest, greatest bond, strongest emotional connection. As the rings go out to the furthest point then it is one of practicality, everyday interaction, perhaps commercial or transactional in nature.
I do think that those outward relationship rings are characterized by assumptions. And that is not a bad thing. The natural assumption is in fact the purpose of the more transactional relationship. The person in the colored apron in a big box store is assumed to be someone who can help you. That is all that relationship needs. It only needs to be sustained until you get the product you came for. Yes, there is a real live person wearing the apron. Even in that transactional setting, mindfulness can cause you to look the person in the eye, smile, greet, acknowledge them as a person. Humanize the transaction.
So through all of the relationship "rings" we become accustomed to the social "grease" that makes the relationship "work". Those are the costumes and masks we wear that fuel social cues that drive the relationship. Again assumptions. Mindfulness creates a feedback mechanism that can check and revalidate that relationship. And adjust it based on the human factor as opposed to the role we see the person in.
Even the very closest relationships have some of these same elements. You have worn several hats...husband, dad, engineer, boss, colleague, business partner...all while you are being the exact same person. Folks interacting with you in any of those roles had certain assumptions about you based on your relationship history.
The very closest. most intimate family relationship are characterized by assumptions as well. Your daughters never had to wonder if you would provide for them, protect them, be present for them. It was implicit in your relationship, your everyday life with them. Dad was, and is now, a constancy that was always there (even when they didn't want you to be!). You were trusted. They could be vulnerable to you. Those two things are most characteristic of a loving, intimate, healthy relationship.
Learning about the secret double life your wife led makes you feel incredible vulnerable. The one person in your life who, above all others, was to have your back, turns out to have been not worthy of the trust implicit (and rightfully assumed) in the relationship.
You knew so little about her because you were deceived. She hid an entire separate life. Emotional capacity in one committed, intimate, exclusive relationship such as marriage is really infinite. But she did not give you any of that, because she did not give you all of that.
I'd caution you to be careful about judging your capacity to have a healthy, loving, intimate relationship based on your current marriage. Look at the partner you had. How she fulfilled the role she committed to have with you. Write your own next chapters in your future relationships. Your W's failure in the relationship has absolutely no predictive value for any future relationship you have.
OK, so lighter notes. I felt the happiness in your words about your DDs upcoming visit. Just days away. Outstanding for you and them. No surprise to me that you have protected them from the drama this week.
It was my post that mentioned the scar. I thought you might have come out of it with a bad ass biker/pirate scar. It would help you in your next business negotiation. But it is fine if we end up with Harry Potter...and tofu...as long as you lose the tofu sometime in the future. Because as I said before, you are already an SI Bad Ass.