** Posting as a Member ** (You all knew I was going to rejoin this, right?)
There are a lot of statements in this thread that I've responded to emotionally, and I drafted replies to the most egregious ones, but ... here's my response....
Yet, if someone says TRUE reconciliation is a unicorn, and say they're speaking from their own personal experience, and the experience of others, they're met with comments from members,and staff, telling them what they've said is a generalization, and not allowed.
Oh, Hellfire, it's entirely possible for a person to know that they are in R or have R'ed and to say so truthfully.
Aside from the issue of accusing other members of lying, a person absolutely cannot know from their own personal experience that R is impossible for everybody. It doesn't matter how many successful Ds and unsuccessful Rs one personally knows about - a single person simply doesn't have enough data to draw conclusions about the population as a whole.
*****
'R is impossible' implies a general rule that BSes must D.
'R is possible' implies that each BS (and WS, for that matter) needs to look at their own life to figure out what's best for them. It further implies that both D & R can be healthy responses that can lead to happiness.
****
I've read a number of post-D statements that the D'ed BS is happy about their decision, and I believe them. Their posts are just too genuine to doubt. I've met some D'ed members at g2gs, and they act too genuinely to doubt, even when they're in the throes of a nasty D.
I've read a number of posts from BSes who have D'ed, married or built new relationships with new people, and have been betrayed again.
I haven't read a lot of posts from members who have found new life partners and are happy. I've read some, but not a lot. I wouldn't expect to, because most members use SI when they're in difficulty, not when their lives are going well. (Hmmm ... that might imply there are many couples who have R'ed and haven't mentioned it on SI....)
Most people are resilient. Most people can heal themselves from something like infidelity. But healing comes from attending to one's own specific wants and getting the specific help one needs. I'll say this, though:
IMO, the less energy one spends drawing conclusions on insufficient data, the more energy one can spend on healing. IMO, the more energy one spends on what other do or should do, the less energy one can spend on healing.
IMO, again, the more energy one spends finding out what's possible for you, the quicker you will heal. I understand - because I feared - wanting R but fearing I couldn't do it. Saying to oneself and, worse, to others that R is impossible keeps one locked in pain, which is the opposite of healing, IMO.
And if you think or write back that you believe R is impossible and aren't in pain, I won't argue with you.
*****
Being new is no reason for getting a pass for posting that R is impossible. Besides, confronting that newbie benefits that newbie. and everyone else who reads the confrontation, by opening up new options.
*****
But IIRC in EVERY SINGLE INSTANCE, the WS didn't truly wake up until the BS had 'had it' and put their foot down.
Sorry. Gotta respond to this specifically. My W woke up before I put my foot down. She resolved to end her A and bear the consequences (She was being blackmailed), and she had resolved to answer any question I asked before I knew about the A.
Otherwise, I have never seen it work.
Thanks. for writing this sentence. In a nutshell, it is exactly the whole problem with posts that over-generalize.
We all can talk about our own experience; we all know ourselves much better than anyone on an anonymous Internet forum can.
None of us can talk about the experiences of others, because all we know is what they present to us. We can't generalize, because we know too little about others. There are no good statistics about infidelity and outcomes. We know ourselves, but we don't know about general populations.
I know what my W says about herself. I know her truth. I know my truth. But I also know that her truth and my truth might not be the same as The Truth.
[This message edited by SI Staff at 7:30 PM, Sunday, March 5th]