Hellfire, I think I love you. It's about impossible to "step over the line" in these threads to the other side, occasionally people do it, but this issue (and others) just seem to lead themselves to near universal gender seperation. What you said, without edit, is exactly how I feel.
So, while it's possible that she looked like she was enjoying them in the video recording, it's probable that she wasn't truly , otherwise, she would have brought this behavior into the marriage. I find it very difficult to believe that alcohol (or even drugs) wouldn't have played a role in that kind of situation as well. And as we all know, what a person does when they're inebriated isn't necessarily an indictment on their true preferences.
This is a HUGE stretch. No, I don't have video of it, but my wife did pretty much this. Not with 3 guys at a time, but just about everything you could imagine, including the "hard nos" with the AP (some of them on the 1st date). She wasn't drunk. She wasn't forced (and to her credit, never claimed she was). And no, no drugs either.
We act like this doesn't happen and it's not an indictment on someone's feelings for someone. It happens. I did it. You may have done it. And NO, it's not ALWAYS an indictment of feelings for someone, but it's certainly a darn good indicator. If I really was attracted to a girl, I'd do more for her in bed. Fire away, call me any name you want, but, that's just how it is. And the girls that were "all over me", yeah, those were the ones that usually opened up the 1001 ways to have sex book before hopping in bed. It's a thing, at least for me it is, and I think we're being entirely disingenuous if we say "Oh, she had to be drunk/high, forced, coerced" or some other version of that. Sure, that could have been the case. She also might have just liked him better. Or found him more attractive so the menu opened up. Or she just gave no f**ks about what he thought of her (most likely answer in my case) and let him go to town.
Chances are, if she chooses to marry, she's satisfied with what she's getting.
That's not implied, at all, by marriage. In my case, I wasn't "satisfied" sexually, I was making a compromise. My wife was an amazing woman in many ways, but our sex life wasn't great at all. Tons of men/women make this sacrifice every day. He's a good dad, but lousy in bed. She's a great mom, but has no sex drive at all. That's a reasonable compromise, right up until you realize that the "no sex drive at all" needs to be altered to "no sex drive for YOU at all" as her past history of gangbangs and sex 4X a night with random guys comes into focus. Then it's NOT AT ALL the same compromise.
Why? Let's say, you found out that she used to do oral in her last relationship. How does that change what was acceptable to you when you entered into marriage together?
Because he would be giving up something important to him under false pretenses. Now, if she came out and said "Yes, I did it with lots of guys before, but no, I will not do it with you" well.. I applaud her honesty, but, we all know, that's not gonna go over well with most guys (which is why, many pages ago, a poster said "just lie" was basically the answer to this issue, which, incidentally, is exactly what my W did). And then, of course, turned around and did oral for the AP every time they were together, well... Yeah, let me tell you, first hand, that sh(t absolutely f**ks someone up. Which is why, if I were to D and date again, I would be uncompromising on this issue, it'll be the "good stuff" or I'm out. And no, that's not fair, and I don't need it pointed out to me, but I'm making a promise to myself that I will never be in the position of having to ask another guy "What's it like to do X with my wife" ever again.
It's a total assumption on your part that "blow jobs = love". Can you not see that?
Everything we value as "love" is an assumption. Diamonds = love. Marriage = love. Anal sex = love. And yes, there's validity to all of them, and all of them are completely wrong at the same time. I'm getting that the OP, like me, has physical touch as a love language. And with that language, you get affection and love physically, the more intimate and "reserved" that act is, the more valued it is (speaking for me personally). And, as I said earlier, we all know this, it plays out in real life all the time. Kind of like a guy, hold his hand, like him, kiss him, really like him, sleep with him, think he's amazing, swallow for him. And I (trying not to generalize) did exactly the same mental calculus, just with different things, if I really liked you, I'd take you on a date, loved you, I'd meet you parents. And sexually, the same scale existed, yes, even for me. The thing is, this scale has aberrations, that one girl I really didn't like who's parents I met, why did I do that?! But, at the same time, it's a decent relative indicator of commitment and "love" for the other person. It's also about exclusivity. If we build a list, how many guys have you:
Held hands with
Kissed on the cheek
Kissed on the lips
BJ
Sex
Swallowed
BDSM
Anal sex
I have a feeling that for most people, that list would run in roughly descending order. 100, 25, 10, 7, 5, 2, 2. Something like that, which, of course, is why the things towards the bottom of the list are often desired, they are exclusive and indicate a different level of commitment and love than those at the top of the list.
Why ignore Occam's Razor on this subject?
Occams razor applies here, but it doesn't say "She was hiding before and now doesn't do that", it says "She doesn't like to do it with me" or, taking it further, "She doesn't like me as much". The scale above, why can I go from holding hands to kissing? Sure, could be she's totally mad about me, but just hates kissing. Could be. But Occam's razor would say "she's not into you". Because, at least in my experience, when a girl didn't want to go "further" with me, it was almost always an indicator of "not into me" vs her hiding who she really was.
I really fail to see how that is any different on the guys side...
It's not Ellie, trust me, you just described my life. And it hurts to the core, just like you predicted it would.