Cookies are required for login or registration. Please read and agree to our cookie policy to continue.

Newest Member: bearsandbulls1

General :
Is your SO's sexual history any of your business?

This Topic is Archived
default

Loukas ( member #47354) posted at 12:12 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

I think my ability to pair-bond has been reduced due to this thread.

I’m not sure I understand, could you explain?

posts: 1862   ·   registered: Mar. 29th, 2015   ·   location: The school of hard knocks
id 8477333
default

KingRat ( member #60678) posted at 12:26 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

It's your shrugging about it and repeated insistence that lifting a single finger to change it is pointless.

I think this is essentially the point of discontent of those posters who view this issue as a double standard and partially why there has been so much. Despite agreeing about the central issue, the persons perceived or who acknowledge being advantaged by the standard will respond to differently than those disadvantaged by it.

posts: 674   ·   registered: Sep. 18th, 2017
id 8477334
default

WornDown ( member #37977) posted at 12:31 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

You're pulling out all the manipulation tactics, aren't you?

I see, so I never used that term and you did put words in my mouth and you were being intellectually dishonest.

Oh, so you're playing this game, eh?

"I didn't say exactly those words, so I didn't really mean it"

Passive-agressive. Check.

Yes, you summarized them in an intellectually dishonest way, and I'd warrant a lot of people on this thread are snickering at your continuing attempts to say otherwise.

Trying to make me think everyone is against me to shut me up. Isolation. Check.

Anyway the idea that having a high partner count might make a man or woman more prone to being unhappy in a long-term relationship is actually really not rocket science. It's common sense. I can hold that opinion confidently.

"I never said what I said." Gaslighting. Check.

Actually I just realized this making up something I said and then accusing me of a thoughtcrime when I was genuinely confused and hoping I would never have said something like that ... was definitely an online form of gaslighting. Wow. That's quite a revelation. I really hate gaslighters. Lowest of the low. If there's one thing being a betrayed spouse has taught me it's that gaslighters are sucky sucky people.

Blameshifting (AKA projection). Check

Playing the victim. Check.

If you are going to try to use those manipulation tactics you might want to try them on someone who didn't spend 25 years with a BPD/NPD. You're going to have to do a whole lot better than that.

On that note, peace out. Keep telling everyone how women's who have slept with a lot of people "women's brains are more sensitive to the "severing" of too many pair bonds" and that "they have difficulty forming long term pair bonds, particularly women" and that they don't make for good potential long-term partners, but that you don't mean they are damaged.

Me: BH (50); exW (49): Way too many guys to count. Three kids (D, D, S, all >20)Together 25 years, married 18; Divorced (July 2015)

I divorced a narc. Separate everything. NC as much as humanly possible and absolutely no phone calls. - Ch

posts: 3359   ·   registered: Jan. 2nd, 2013   ·   location: Around the Block a few times
id 8477338
default

Loukas ( member #47354) posted at 12:37 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Geez WD, you really wanted to go down with that ship, huh?

I guess I just have to wonder why? Answer don’t answer, it’s just thought in my head.

posts: 1862   ·   registered: Mar. 29th, 2015   ·   location: The school of hard knocks
id 8477340
default

Rideitout ( member #58849) posted at 12:38 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

If you see something that sucks, the way to change it is to be among the people who stand up and say "no more." Just because it's always been this way does not mean it has to stay that way.

What exactly am I saying "no more" to? I've already removed myself from the extra-curricular activities at work (well, not the activities themselves, I was never involved in them, but the discussion of those activities). I don't hear much about it anymore, but I'm sure it's still going on. But I really don't know what you'd have me do here? Get myself invited back to "drinks with the guys" and then blast them when they start telling their "war stories". What do you think that's going to accomplish? They're not doing anything illegal, there's no way to get them fired for it, these women (much like my W) are entirely willing participants. If I slam my fist on the table and say "no more", great. I'm sure they'll have a laugh at my expense and move right back to the iPhones. I'm not even sure what I'm condemning here (let's leave the married guys out of it, that's obvious, and yes, that's the vast majority of them, but not all). Stop lying to women to get laid asshole! Ugh, OK, now I'm actually a hypocrite, because, I did exactly the same thing before I was married. I'm not saying there's nothing to do here, I just don't see what my role is in it. In fact, if anything, I think that the biggest role here is with women, stop falling for this shit and they'll stop doing it. I know, that's not fair either, but that has a much higher probability of stopping their behavior (and my behavior before marriage) than anything else. If the BS stops working, or if it did, for me, I would have tried something else and stopped it.

As a parent, your job is to instill the values you want your children to take out into the world.

Of course, and I think that's very important. And, making this less inflammatory, when I asked my father, as many young boys do, "how do I get a Ferrari", he gave me both answers. "The car doesn't make the man", but, if you really want one then, this is what you do. It's a complete answer, and one that doesn't judge the choices, just lays out the fact that some choices make more sense than others.

That sure doesn't sound like advice from someone who reviles the system and wants to see it end. That's the plan made by someone who is counting on that system remaining the status quo and then teaching his child how to perpetuate it.

Perpetrate it? Absolutely not. Operate inside that system and succeed in their goals, absolutely. Look, I'm going to be honest with you, I absolutely HATED the system when I was younger. Hated it with a passion. And then, in time, I grew to accept it, an acceptance that came as I learned to operate effectively in the system the way it really works. See, my father, in particular, was much like many of the posters here, a starry eyed optimist. "Just be a good man and it'll happen for you". And while I think we all agree, that's a great "fatherly" answer, it's also, in my personal experience, bullshit. If you want it, you have to go after it, not wait for it to fall into your lap. What my father taught me was how the world "should be", and I'm grateful for that message because it gave me a compass. What he did not give me enough of is the "world as it is" version. It's great to instill hope in children, I agree with that, but don't stop there, teach them how to make their hopes a reality. Want to be rich? OK, fine, here's how you do it (and no, it's not fun at all, you'll sacrifice a ton of your life for it, and it may not make you happy; all things I would add to the conversation; but it's NOT my decision to make, and I'm not going to tell you to "follow your dreams" as the way to get rich, it's not (or not for most people)).

posts: 3290   ·   registered: May. 21st, 2017
id 8477341
default

DevastatedDee ( member #59873) posted at 1:14 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

I’m not sure I understand, could you explain?

Humor. Sarcasm.

DDay: 06/07/2017
MH - RA on DDay.
Divorced a serial cheater (prostitutes and lord only knows who and what else).

posts: 5083   ·   registered: Jul. 27th, 2017
id 8477351
default

DevastatedDee ( member #59873) posted at 1:17 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

I just imagine if No Politics decided that "black people don't get to be President, that's just the way it is". If all women had decided that "my role is to obey my husband and spend my life having kids and cleaning the house. If all gay people had decided "Well, I clearly am an abomination unworthy of love and happiness, so I just as well marry someone of the opposite gender and pretend until I die". What progress would we have if we all said "well, it sucks, but that's just the way it is".

[This message edited by SI Staff at 7:42 PM, December 4th (Wednesday)]

DDay: 06/07/2017
MH - RA on DDay.
Divorced a serial cheater (prostitutes and lord only knows who and what else).

posts: 5083   ·   registered: Jul. 27th, 2017
id 8477354
default

Loukas ( member #47354) posted at 1:22 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Humor. Sarcasm.

Ah. At the expense of the men in this thread? I mean, that’s just an assumption based on you talking about single men earlier in this thread, so I assume men was the target. Anyway, super progressive! Go gang!

[This message edited by Loukas at 7:23 PM, December 4th (Wednesday)]

posts: 1862   ·   registered: Mar. 29th, 2015   ·   location: The school of hard knocks
id 8477356
flag

SI Staff ( Moderator #10) posted at 1:42 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

PM for you DevastatedDee

posts: 10035   ·   registered: May. 30th, 2002
id 8477361
default

BraveSirRobin ( member #69242) posted at 1:47 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

If I slam my fist on the table and say "no more", great. I'm sure they'll have a laugh at my expense and move right back to the iPhones.

Which, up until quite recently, was pretty much the experience of every woman who was ever in a room with a bunch of men who didn't think she belonged there. Maybe add some sexual slurs and/or an ass grabbing for good measure, before men believed there were consequences for those actions.

I think I'm somewhere around 10 years older than you. If little BSR had asked her daddy how to get a Ferrari, would it have been ok to tell her to marry someone rich enough to buy her one, because it was laughable that she could grow up to earn one of her own? Fuck that noise. Most women are not satisfied with playing within that system or telling our daughters to do so. We're tearing it down. And yes, we routinely have to be willing to endure more than a sneering, dismissive laugh to do so. That's a pretty low bar for the courage of genuine convictions.

WW/BW

posts: 3768   ·   registered: Dec. 27th, 2018
id 8477363
default

Loukas ( member #47354) posted at 2:00 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

We're tearing it down. And yes, we routinely have to be willing to endure more than a sneering, dismissive laugh to do so. That's a pretty low bar for the courage of genuine convictions.

Yup, fuck this. I’m out.

I’m still shocked at WornDown’s...well I don’t know how to describe it as anything else but malicious attack on Thumos. Like that shit was fucked up. But when emergent actually backed it up and claimed it was clear as day? Fuck, I’m seriously at a loss. Like twilight zone shit. Then to make a claim about tearing down a system due to perceived double standards despite obvious ones?

posts: 1862   ·   registered: Mar. 29th, 2015   ·   location: The school of hard knocks
id 8477370
default

rambler ( member #43747) posted at 2:30 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Hate to take this thread back on topic but....

One thing we all should have learned, often it is not the affair it is the trickle truth and the lies, given that how can you start your marriage or advise someone else to do so.

,

A man found out his new boss gangbanged his wife and was provided video. The response from some here is they are more concerned that the guy slut shamed his wife. Talk about empathy. For curiosity, if her conduct is not the definition of being a slut, what is.

This is not a different standard by any means. All people in the gang bang are being held to the same standard. No one us defending the men. I am very happy the former boss has been fired and more than likely will do jail time.

Most men do not participate in gang bangs. The men who do tend to hate women and gang bang to demean her. It is very difficult to watch someone demean someone you love, even harder when the one you love enjoys being demeaned.

making it through

posts: 1426   ·   registered: Jun. 17th, 2014   ·   location: Chicago
id 8477391
default

PSTI ( member #53103) posted at 2:58 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Most men do not participate in gang bangs. The men who do tend to hate women and gang bang to demean her. It is very difficult to watch someone demean someone you love, even harder when the one you love enjoys being demeaned.

Not sure where on earth you get this proposition, but I'd love to see stats to back that up because in my experience, definitely not.

Acts are not demeaning. People are.

[This message edited by PSTI at 8:59 PM, December 4th (Wednesday)]

Me: BW, my xH left me & DS after a 14 year marriage for the AP in 2014.

Happily remarried and in an open/polyamorous relationship. DH (married 5 years) & DBF (dating 4 years). Cohabitating happily all together!! <3

posts: 917   ·   registered: May. 6th, 2016
id 8477407
default

Greeneyesbluezy ( member #58158) posted at 3:21 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Thumos,

I followed the whole thread.

You never said that or implied that in your personal opinion. It’s actually a laughable summarization of your posts. And, definitely with a goal in mind. True readers won’t buy it.

Loukas, don’t go out. Listen and engage with the people who can actually interact and tell their stories. Don’t listen to rabble rousers who “summarize.”

I’m shocked. Actually shocked that in this forum, with betrayed men offering opinions, that they would be ostracized for their opinions, which never led to shaming in any way shape or form.

We are actually supposed to help heal each other here.

Stop right there, I already don't give a fuck.

posts: 1248   ·   registered: Apr. 5th, 2017
id 8477418
default

Murkywaters ( member #60252) posted at 3:24 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Not sure where on earth you get this proposition, but I'd love to see stats to back that up because in my experience, definitely not.

Acts are not demeaning. People are.

Is gangbanging some woman not the pinnacle of objectifying her? A group of men using someone only for what her body has to offer in moment? Seems like I'm always hearing that objectification is demeaning/dehumanizing.

posts: 139   ·   registered: Aug. 21st, 2017   ·   location: US
id 8477420
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 3:47 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Most men do not participate in gang bangs. The men who do tend to hate women and gang bang to demean her. It is very difficult to watch someone demean someone you love, even harder when the one you love enjoys being demeaned.

Not sure where on earth you get this proposition, but I'd love to see stats to back that up because in my experience, definitely not.

Which part are you objecting to? The "hate" part?

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8477433
default

Thissucks5678 ( member #54019) posted at 3:54 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

I’m almost hesitant to post at this point - this thread is nuts. But, I would just like to say a couple of things. As a BW with I presume a much higher number than my WH (maybe a high number for women, not even sure at this point) - I do not think it has impaired my partner bonding as I have been working on reconciliation for 3 1/2 years with my WH.

Also, as BW with the higher number and crazier sexual experiences (my WH knows about the experiences, just not my number because I got burned in the past by an ex) this thread has prompted me to give him an estimate when the time is right (he is out of town), because if he can’t handle it, I don’t care anymore and I want no part of him. I think I held it back in the past because of my ex who went crazy - but I’ll be damned if I’m going to be judged by him over some dumb shit I got into when I was in high school. If he needs a divorce over it, I’ll gladly give him one. He knows I was not a saint and knows it was more than him, so I don’t think he will care at all, but I will be at peace either way. I was a perfect angel the entire time we were married and I didn’t lie, I just opted out of the conversation because I was too afraid of being judged for my past.

DDay: 6/2016

“Every test in our life makes us Bitter or Better. Every problem comes to Break Us or Make Us. The choice is ours whether to be Victim or Victor.” - unknown

posts: 1793   ·   registered: Jul. 7th, 2016
id 8477439
default

 GoldenR (original poster member #54778) posted at 4:18 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Funny how the topic has become almost solely focused on number of partners.

posts: 2855   ·   registered: Aug. 22nd, 2016   ·   location: South Texas
id 8477452
default

Incarnate ( member #46085) posted at 4:25 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Funny how the topic has become almost solely focused on number of partners.

To be frank, a recurring theme at the beginning was "If a woman had [X] number of partners, I would want to know because I find that problematic."

Then it went back and forth with women feeling objectified and men feeling judged for their preferences.

Me: BH
She: EW
Divorce in progress
DD1: 11/29/14
DD2: 8/14/19

What a wicked game we play.

posts: 768   ·   registered: Dec. 26th, 2014   ·   location: Northern California
id 8477455
default

DevastatedDee ( member #59873) posted at 4:25 AM on Thursday, December 5th, 2019

Ah. At the expense of the men in this thread? I mean, that’s just an assumption based on you talking about single men earlier in this thread, so I assume men was the target. Anyway, super progressive! Go gang!

Really?

Have I oppressed you with my humor? Goodness.

DDay: 06/07/2017
MH - RA on DDay.
Divorced a serial cheater (prostitutes and lord only knows who and what else).

posts: 5083   ·   registered: Jul. 27th, 2017
id 8477457
This Topic is Archived
Cookies on SurvivingInfidelity.com®

SurvivingInfidelity.com® uses cookies to enhance your visit to our website. This is a requirement for participants to login, post and use other features. Visitors may opt out, but the website will be less functional for you.

v.1.001.20251009a 2002-2025 SurvivingInfidelity.com® All Rights Reserved. • Privacy Policy