Stevesn,
it seems to me your original plan of divorce and then let her try and win you back was probably the best approach.
Maybe the thing is that I don't feel the need of "emergency exit" door handle within the reach any time any more. She has shown that once she got out of initial shock, she was able to discuss D, custody, etc. without drama, concentrating on the best approach for all of us. So it looks like it is not necessary to do it right now. Of course, if she relapses into wayward mode again, things might change.
I'm not sure how you just restart trust with her after all she has done.
Me too. But "restart" is not the right word. Rebuild? Build something completely new?
She really should be at best on a level playing field with any other potential love interest out there looking to win your heart.
This was never my plan. I said, that even if I divorce her but give her a chance to win me back, then I won't be looking for other love interests.
TBH level with them is probably in a better position than she deserves.
Theoretically yes, you are right.
What are your plans. Have you started that 6 month virtual clock yet?
No timeframe for that any more. If I feel that she's not doing enough or that I'm drifting away from her further and further, then why wait 6 months?
The plan? To observe. I'm not doing 180, since I feel strong enough emotionally to be able to assess the situation and to make appropriate decisions.
My rational mind tells me that reconciling would be the best outcome for me and the kids (I'm intentionally leaving her out of this equation). And I mean really reconciling.
Psychologist with whom we had MC session (not really MC, we just described our situation, WW will be going to IC with her) said, that WS, who did all the hard work to really understand her/his actions and put corresponding boundaries, etc. should be safer partner than one who didn't cheat, but has no understanding about real underlying motives of his actions, choices, etc. and I think I agree with that.
M1965, you don't need to apologize.
what does your wayward need to do to make their dishonesty, betrayal, and lack of integrity and commitment acceptable?
What do they say or do that will make you say, "Oh, okay, that's fine. Let's just get back to it as if you never did any of that stuff"?
There's nothing she can do to make all of this acceptable. All she can do is to make sure that it doesn't happen again and that impact her actions had on me are minimized.
It seems like your wife suddenly decided to become public property, allowing full access to her life and body to pretty much anyone. There are some men who would be fine with that, some who would like to sit and watch, but that isn't you.
Yes, it looks exactly like that (and yes, that isn't me). It looks like something just broke inside her. 14 years - nothing and then just baaaaam like she's off the leash. It might sound weird, but maybe that's encouraging thing? If she fixes what broke, maybe she can be really safe partner (again?)?
The thing is she's now doing EVERYTHING (except things that I explicitly told her not to do) to prove that she can become different, safe person. I just can't find a hole in her actions that tells me she's not genuinely remorseful. So the main question now is - will she be able to keep it that way for a long time?
Another thing is what I saw in the recordings of her with AP#3. I saw woman who was really miserable. She complained to him that it's not the way she wants to live, she needs something stable, that she tried living "for today only", "taking all the chances" and it was piece of shit. When I asked her then why she did it (i.e. started with AP3), she answered that she felt like she was heading straight to the bottom, she didn't understand me, she had no idea how to get out of this situation, was afraid to divorce. She remarked to her friend - "I'm doing everything to destroy myself".
During one conversation I said that I don't trust her, I'm not sure that her remorse is genuine, that maybe she's just trying to remain with me to have comfortable life, etc. Her answer was - "I already tried that - false R. I felt like shit, you heard it yourself. Why would I do that again?". I answered that she's not very well known for making rational decisions lately (but she has a point - I kept this part silent).
I'm a little bit confused about the replies to my latest post. She finally has enough strength to disclose some rather important facts about her affair on her own (previously it was just details about things that I already knew/suspected), does this in the time when she's fully aware that slightest thing might send her packing, and everybody starts screaming - DIVORCE!!! That's because she fucked 24 times instead of 16? Or because she had oral?
[This message edited by DarkHoleHeart at 3:57 AM, August 30th (Wednesday)]