Surprised,
1. Have you had any sexual contact (kissing, inapproriate touching, oral, anal, vaginal, etc) of any kind with anyone that (my name) doesn't know about?
2. Did you ever discuss anything in regards to your pregnancy with (other man's name) besides funding for a DNA test?
3. Is the timeline that you wrote truthful and complete?
4. Do you wish to remain married because you are committed to your marriage?
Question 1 she answered no, and she was being truthful.
Question 2 she answered no, and the results was inconclusive
Question 3 she answered yes, and the results was inconclusive.
Question 4 she answered yes and she was being truthful.
I am glad to hear that the answers were so positive, and it’s reassuring that there was no ‘car park confession’. That does tally up with the phone conversation you caught on VAR where your wife said that she had told you everything, even though you thought she hadn’t.
I’m no expert in polygraphs, but the inconclusive result to question 2 might have occurred because although there must have been more said in relation to the pregnancy, the major factor that your wife focused on was the DNA test. It’s a question that hinges on the importance of what was discussed in your wife’s remembrance. The DNA test may have been her focus, and she may have had little time or interest for anything else that was said, but the fact that anything else was said (even if it was ignored), could cause a ‘wobble’ in answering a straight yes or no question about only one thing having been discussed.
People have questioned why your wife went to the OM first for a DNA test, but if she was worried that he might have been the father, with all the implications for your marriage that went with that, she would want to try and get clarity on the father’s identity before saying anything to you. Not a great situation, but I don’t think her doing that is necessarily an indication that she wanted to run off and start a new life with the guy; I think it was done more to try and figure out the ‘damage’ before she said anything to you. Also, if she had wanted to leave you and be with him, she could simply have asked for a divorce and gone, couldn’t she? It might have been horrible thing to do, but if she really thought he was God’s gift to women, and you were a busted flush, why wouldn’t she have called it quits and set up home with the OM? Answer: because that’s not what she wanted at heart. Maybe she did have some issues with your marriage, and maybe she did embark on an affair that she really should never have got involved with, but the two things are not necessarily linked. People in great marriages still embark on affairs, and people in crummy marriages don’t.
Then there’s the OM and his refusal to fund the DNA test. I’m guessing that he was trying to use the pregnancy as leverage to break up your marriage, which would explain why he didn’t want to fund a DNA test that might prove he was not the father. You have said that your wife is pretty and bold, and the OM was probably more smitten with her than she was with him, particularly if he started getting abusive when he wasn’t getting his way. Whether or not he ever drugged your wife, as in the discussed roofie incident, will never be known now, but the guy is clearly not a prince. It may not have been a wise or commendable hook-up on the part of your wife, but the OM certainly went out of his way to make detaching as difficult as he could, which again points to him being more interested in your wife than she was in him once the ‘shine’ came off the affair.
The inconclusive result to question three may hinge on the issue of your wife having been drunk on several occasions, and not being able to recall 100% of what had happened. In an earlier post, I said that “I can’t remember” is a classic politician’s answer that avoids a straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer, but also avoids an accusation of lying. As a principle, that’s true, but to be fair to your wife, if she was drunk as a skunk during some of the meetings with the OM, she could quite genuinely not remember what happened, without any deliberate minimising or trickle-truthing. So there could be an element of self-doubt that produced the inconclusive result, where your wife thinks the timeline is complete, but cannot say with 100% certainty that it is. With the timeline, if you accept that she might not recall 100% of everything due to being drunk, an honest answer of “I think so”, or “This is it, to the best of my recollection”, is an honest answer, but not a cast-iron, definitive ‘Yes’.
Given that your wife is concerned and wants to take the test again, maybe it would be good to talk through the issues around questions two and three, rather than spending money to re-do the test. I can understand your concerns about not getting definitive answers to those questions, but the reasons for that may not be deep or dark, they may simply be:
(1) Other stuff may have been talked about, but the only actual action your wife discussed in relation to the pregnancy was a DNA test, and;
(2) Your wife simply cannot give a 100% definitive guarantee on the timeline because while she thinks it is complete, she is not 100% sure of that (without any lying or trickle-truthing being involved).
Just my thoughts, adding to the debate, and trying to be fair to your wife. There are elements of this where she probably genuinely can’t give an answer that she is totally confident of due to drink, but you did get ‘good’ results to two of the ‘big’ questions.
Your wife's willingness to do another test is another positive sign, isn't it?