On one hand, my W took months to see herself as getting it. She has said that it took her 5 months to see her A as 'just another sordid A'; it took her 5 months, in her word, just to start feeling remorse.
But on d-day: 1) she went NC; 2) she told the truth; 3) she started building boundaries; 4) she accepted responsibility; 5) came clean to her IC; 6) etc., etc., etc. She DID turn on a dime.
So she didn't feel remorseful for 5 months, but her behavior was aimed at healing beginning on 12/22/10.
I observed her for 90 days and saw total consistency. I decided she was a good bet for R; I wanted R; I committed to R.
But that's me, just one data point. IMO, there are so many variables involved in the D/R choice that one can't formulate an actionable rule that works for everyone.
So add me the school of thought that says each BS is on their own in deciding how much time to give their WS.
Remember: you can hold your head high after d-day whether you D or R. Making a success of your choice is a matter of taking responsibility for yourself and your choices and making the best of them.
*****
There are perhaps 2 sides to the 180. One side has to do with building the BS's recognition of the BS's power and self-love. That's important - it's really something every one of us should be doing, BS or not.
The other part has to do with minimizing communication and communicating lies (i.e. that the BS doesn't care about the WS or what the WS does).
R requires a lot of communication. There's no doubt in my mind that virtually every BS should increase communication with WS as a way of testing the WS's candidacy for R. If the WS accepts the invitations, it's positive for R; if the WS doesn't accept the invitations, the WS is a good candidate for D.
Some people see the 180 as a way of manipulating an unremorseful WS into R. I have no doubt that this sort of manipulation is a losing game. Who wants a partner who has to be manipulated into being a partner?
Build yourself up, by all means, but don't call it 'the 180.' The 180 was developed by a woman who could not detach from an unremorseful WS. It got into print because the woman's WS saw what he was about to lose, and he tried to win her back. But that just happened; it was not her goal.
The goal of the 180 is for a BS to detach from an unremorseful WS so the BS can proceed to D.
*****
I think we see 2 types of advice on SI.
One type aims at getting the thread opener to go for a particular solution. I really hate to see that type of advice, because no one here knows enough about another person's sitch to be able to tell them what is best for them except in very general ways, especially when the other person is an anonymous poster in the well-known-for-untruth-Internet.
The other type aims at helping the thread opener get what the thread opener wants.
I was almost 2 months out when I found SI, and I don't like to be told what to do, so I quickly rejected the posts that told me I needed to D. I was grateful for the advice that aimed to help me find my way, since IMO we all have to do that.
Bigger started a thread called 'Fantasy vs. R\reality' on this topic, and I recommend looking at it.
[This message edited by sisoon at 1:02 PM, April 16th (Friday)]