Well… I think the OM really might mean “nothing” to her…
It fits in with the commonly held principle here on SI that the affair is never about faults in the betrayed spouse but all about faults in the wayward spouse.
Your wife didn’t cheat because YOU were lacking, but totally 100% because SHE was lacking. So, it’s not that OM was so perfect but rather that he had the pieces that she thought fitted into what she was lacking. For some reason, she allowed the relationship with OM develop into something it shouldn’t ever have become.
Let’s imagine how something develops into an affair. It’s not like your WW sends the OM (or he her) an e-mail “let’s get together for sex” right away… It develops, it progresses. Step-by-step. It might be (relatively) innocent in the beginning but at some point, she should have drawn a line in the sand. There was that e-mail, that message, that conversation where she KNEW it was crossing the fence that protects the marriage.
It’s a conscious decision. She was totally aware of that moment when she allowed it to go that one step over the fence.
But in all this the only role the OM had was to play along.
He fed her fantasy and she gave what was needed to get more kibbles. It goes both ways – I’m not trying to paint your wife as an innocent fish that’s lured to the hook by a willy angler. OM was getting feedback to his kibbles. As far as this goes then it was TOTALLY HER role to stop this before it got too far.
The OM is “nothing” because he himself is nothing. The kibbles he fed her – those were “something”.
Of course, it’s hard for a person having an affair to justify it with the truth: I am cheating because of my own deficiencies. It’s a lot easier to justify the affair through others faults: My husband is distant and therefore I had to seek emotional support with OM. Or to justify the affair through others advantages: OM is so attentive and therefore so great.
Statistics indicate that relationships that are founded in infidelity seldom last. Over 80% are over within a year, less than 5% last two years. I think the reason is that once you start experiencing reality with a person then simply fulfilling what you are lacking isn’t good enough…
Think of it this way: Imagine that a “normal” person is 50 and that a “normal” marriage of two normal people totals 100. Sometimes one or both of those normal people might be under the weather and the marriage only totals 90. Sometimes one is under the weather but the other makes up for it so you stay at 100. Sometimes both make the effort and the marriage coasts along at 120…
A person that decides to cheat isn’t “normal” and isn’t 50 as far as relationships is concerned. So, if your WW were to start a more permanent relationship with OM (who is also cheating) it’s way below the required 100… A constant 60 relationship won’t last. ‘
Your wife has had a real dose of reality poured all over her fantasy. She stands to lose her marriage, the partner of a lifetime, the security of the family, is facing single-parenthood and pregnancy… Plenty to make her realize that MAYBE she had the affair for all the wrong reasons. Maybe OM’s reactions have hammered home that she didn’t do it for him or because of him but rather she cheated for herself and purely selfish reasons.
But not that it matters…
She cheated.
On another point:
Really think about your conditions for reconciliation.
I understand the moral dilemma you face: If child yours then you want to be there to raise it. If not, you don’t want to be around. I get that. It’s a tough and shitty position.
But I also read your comment about the woman controlling her body and I am fully in agreement with that. But IMHO when you tell your wife that it’s her choice whether to abort or not but at the same time tell her that if it’s his you are out and if it’s yours you are not… IMHO that’s borderline…
IMHO the paternity of the child isn’t the key issue of whether your marriage can be reconciled or not. The key issues are (a) is your wife willing to fix what was wrong and made her decide to have an affair (b) can you commit to reconciliation and (c) is she willing to commit to reconciliation.
IMHO a (probably) more honest response to your wife would be along the lines of irrespective of paternity then reconciliation isn’t a given. If you were to commit to R you realize it’s a very tough struggle and that things like potentially having the constant reminder of OM in the form of his child would possibly make a near-impossible task impossible.