I really think your BH may agree with me that there is a better way than ENM.
That would be really interesting if true, considering his activities and fantasies…
Would you consider the possibility that you have desensitized yourself so much since your late teens regarding the sacredness of sex, and hence that is why you are so easily would allow your husband to have sex with others?
Sex is sex. I like it a lot; I wouldn’t consider it all "cheap." There’s fucking, and there’s making love, and there’s everything in between. Some kinds are easy to get, others are much more rare. I’ve experienced a great deal, and I don’t regret any of it. As I’ve said, sex with my H is incredibly special to me, both because of the quality and the emotional intimacy we share. I don’t see that being taken away or diminished in any way by him having sex with other people. After all, if he’s so good in bed, it would be pretty stingy of me not to share! (That’s a joke. I don’t think anyone is stingy for not wanting to share, of course.)
I have simply never needed monogamy from anybody I’ve dated; it’s not something that I did mind at first that went away over time… I think that some (most) people are just born unable to accept their partners doing that, and others (a tiny few) are born not minding it, and that’s just how they are. You’re reading into it too much, I think.
I did not consider the impact on the wives or the children of the married men I previously had relationships with, because I was selfish. I wanted what I wanted from those men, and that was that. I rationalized that i didn’t owe their families my fidelity, and that if their wives were taking care of them at home, they wouldn’t be seeking extramarital sex and relationships… that a home couldn’t be wrecked by someone who didn’t live in it, but rather that the home was broken to begin with, such that the WHs were stepping outside of it… Very, very, very wrong, dastardly thinking and immoral behavior of course on my part, of course, but it had nothing to do with how I view sex itself.
To those women, I would be quite confident that sex with their husband was deemed exclusive and sacred.
Exclusive, maybe, but probably not "sacred." According to their husbands, many of them did not enjoy sex and only "gave it to" their men after much pestering (see: duty sex), on rare occasions, if they were trying to conceive, as a "reward" for behavior deemed as pleasing to them, as if it were currency… Some of them would withhold it in order to punish their husbands, as well. Sex is not put up on a pedestal as this wonderful, God-given expression of love and ultimate intimacy in every marriage, unfortunately.
Would you be OK if while allowing your husband to have sex with another, that he had a baby with them? I mean that is a real possibility with good and successful sex.
I’m lol’ing at "good and successful sex," in that context, but to answer your question… No, I don’t want him starting families with anyone else. Our existing children deserve his full time and attention; it’s not fair for them to miss out on him because he has to spend time with another family. That’s not something we can justly choose for them, the way I can choose to share him with others… As I mentioned earlier, one of my conditions is that he must take every reasonable precaution against pregnancy in any encounter. He can choose women who have been surgically sterilized, ones that are on hormonal contraceptives, ones that are regular and aren’t close to ovulating… He would need to wear a condom, of course, and he could pull out as well. Or he could stick to sex that isn’t PIV. The more you layer up on contraceptive measures, the more unlikely it becomes that unwanted pregnancy will occur, even if one or more measures fail. The odds can approach zero if you do it correctly.
So maybe at this point it is true, you just do not have the capacity or volition for all monogamy has to offer.
I am capable of being monogamous with BH if that’s what he needs from me. He is all that I want and need. I just have some internal work to do to make sure no infidelity happens in the future, that’s all.
But we are not animals.
We are, actually! Just (sometimes) very intelligent, capable, complex animals. The only other options for taxonomical kingdoms are bacteria, archaea, protista, fungi, or plants, and we’re definitely not any of those! 🤓