My W immediately stopped lying as she revealed her A. She wen NC. She never blame-shifted, minimized or TTed. That looked like remorse both to me and to W's therapist, who became our IC.
I am not here to judge really if your wife was remorseful or not. However, I will point this out:
When my affair ended, I put myself in IC immediately. When I was stable enough two months later, I confessed everything. I never lied about any of the fact related to my affair.
I came here and started posting far before my husband knew this site even existed.
So when I think of remorse it’s about having deep empathy for the damage created. It isn’t the same as feeling a responsibility to clean up your mess. Though both are helpful.
I mean I did a lot of things right, but it doesn’t mean that I was in a place where empathy was the driver or that I understood this all as trauma.
I will also point out your wife is in the mental health profession, so she may be a rare bird who did understand the trauma she inflicted. To me that would be indicative of her empathy being shut off, but I don’t know her and you do.
But most ws re so overwhelmed about their feelings about what they have done, fear and guilt and shame and all of it, they are not equipped to understand the damage enough to let that fully guide their behaviors. Instead it’s almost like when you are a little kid and got punished for something. Even a little kid can be compliant and act accordingly, but they may not be sorry that their sibling needed stitches until they are of an age thier empathy is more developed.
I feel my baseline is empathetic. But in the midst of a crisis after a long period of not handling smaller issues well I was completely out of my depths and my tendency to self punish was frustrated by him layering in what I was perceiving as rubbing that in. I know it’s not right, but that’s where I was. And I did not act with empathy- I acted in a way to try and find my way out of something I was very lost in and it just so happens some of those behaviors could look like remorse or ended up being helpful.
And we will have to agree to disagree about whether or not you can really expect someone who is acting so irrationally to respect a rule that you can not read something that is written in a public space. I get her doing it against his wishes is problematic. But here is what it reminds me of-
You have advocated for a bs to be able to get permission to have the therapy notes be reviewed by the bs. And I get that is an agreement your wife made and what the two of you want to do is up to the two of you. However,in many cases I think a ws trying to save their marriage would be highly susceptible to that being agreed upon under duress (not asserting it was the case for your wife)
To me it is so more egregious to expect that openness from the ws to disclose private sessions meant to shape better mental health to a bs. Most bs would think what is done in IC is not what they want to happen. The think the ws is there to save their marriage and that’s what should be discussed. But to save their marriage they may need development that would seem very negative to someone unfamiliar with the process. Not to mention now the ws will most definitely want to sanitize what is being said in these seasons which negates the ability to tap
Into the authenticity and vulnerability of putting it all out there so they can hear themselves and nough to see the error in their thinking.
Yes, to build trust a ws should have honored his wishes. But this never works in the whole history of me being here. That agreement gets broken by both sides every single time. I am writing this part more for the audience than you - the best rule you could have with SI is either don’t bring it to your ws at all or bring them here and know that you are going to want to know what they are saying and vice versa and be okay with not sanitizing it. Anything else is setting up the situation for failure.
[This message edited by hikingout at 6:23 PM, Friday, January 9th]