Me again.....
I still do not have the full disclosure.
It was promised at the end of May. Then June. Then this weekend. Now it is apparently three weeks from now.
All of that is frustrating enough on its own, but I have tried to tell myself that if the delay means it is deeper, more honest, more complete, and not just another polished version of partial truth, then maybe I have to be patient. I do understand that a real disclosure is not supposed to be rushed if the goal is actual truth and not just damage control. Being the fourth "full" disclosure, three previous full of lies and omissions, this is truly her last chance at it and she knows.
But last night we were talking after I had pulled completely away for a few days, and the conversation turned to her IC and why this is taking so long. She told me, "My therapist has told me over the last few sessions that I am not to try and make you happy, or try to help you in any way. I have to heal myself and that is my only priority. You have to heal you and that is not my concern."
I understand what I think her therapist probably means. At least logically I do. I assume the point is that my wife has to fix whatever is broken in her, because chasing my reactions, managing my mood, or trying to soothe me without doing the deeper work is not the same as becoming safe.
But what I heard was something very different.
What I heard was, "You are on your own."
And that hit something in me hard.
Because why would I heal with her if I am healing alone anyway? Why would I choose reconciliation, with the person who caused the wound still standing beside me, if the message she is receiving is that helping me is not part of her job? It would be vastly easier to heal without her in front of me every day. Without her words. Without her delays. Without her blank spots. Without the constant reminder that the person I am supposed to somehow feel safe with is the same person who made me unsafe in the first place.
That is the part I am struggling with.
I have heard over and over that her healing is hers and my healing is mine. I get that. I am not asking her to do my healing for me. She cannot climb inside my chest and undo what she did. She cannot make the images disappear. She cannot return the years. She cannot give me back the man I was before I found out.
But if reconciliation means I carry my pain alone while she works on herself separately, then what exactly are we rebuilding together?
Because the damage was not separate.
She did not betray herself in isolation. She betrayed me. She betrayed our marriage. She betrayed our children’s home. She brought another man into the foundation of my life and then let me live inside that lie for years.
And sometimes I do not think she understands the difference between working on herself and repairing what she destroyed.
This triggered me so badly because she already has a history of speaking from her own perspective with almost no awareness of what her words do to me. A perfect example is when I asked her why she brought her affair partner to OUR wedding. Her answer was very matter of fact: "Because I wanted to share MY special day with him. I cared about him, you know."
My special day. With him.
There was no pause. No visible recognition of what that sentence would do to me. No immediate understanding that she was talking about our wedding, our vows, my life, my consent, my reality. She said it like she was explaining a seating arrangement.
So when she tells me now that her therapist said she should not try to help me in any way, I do not trust that she is hearing the nuance. I do not trust that she understands the difference between not making me responsible for her healing and abandoning responsibility for the harm she caused.
Maybe her IC is saying, "In this room, we are here to work on you. You need to understand your choices, your patterns, your lies, your avoidance, your selfishness, and your broken thinking." That would make sense to me.
But what seems to have landed in my wife’s head is, "Do not worry about helping him. Do not worry about making him feel safe. Do not worry about his timeline. Just heal yourself."
And I honestly do not know what to do with that.
I do have empathy for waywards, at least to a degree. I imagine it must be an awfully hard line to walk. Fix yourself, but do not become self-absorbed. Help your betrayed spouse, but do not perform healing just to get approval. Be patient with their pain, but do not make their reactions the center of your recovery. Become safe because it is right, not because you are trying to win something back.
I can understand that intellectually. But emotionally, I am sitting here thinking, if I am on my own anyway, why stay in the blast radius?
Am I reading this through a triggered mind? Does it make sense that an IC would tell a wayward not to worry about helping the betrayed spouse in any way? Or is the real message probably being misunderstood by someone who still struggles to understand the difference between healing herself and repairing the devastation she caused?
I am sometimes still very unsure of what I even want or need from her, but this seems like the point was lost. Maybe I am just confused by you heal you and I heal me, can someone explain to me what is meant by this while still trying to make it work? I know for a fact that if I disconnect too far emotionally my analytical mind will take over and that will be the end of US.