Cookies are required for login or registration. Please read and agree to our cookie policy to continue.

Newest Member: Birthdaydiscovery

Divorce/Separation :
Is it any wonder marriage stats are going down

This Topic is Archived
default

 leftbroken (original poster member #53741) posted at 12:38 AM on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020

So speaking with a nephew that I hadn't spoken to in around a year. I knew at the time that he and his common law partner were having problems and would likely be splitting up. Its a young couple that produced 1 off spring. He and the live in GF were together for about 2 years and then split up. They were split up for about 2 years and then one day while both had been drinking they hooked up and low and behold she ends up pregnant, poor judgement on both of their parts. They decide to try to make a go of it and she moves in with him (relocation is a long-distance move for her to where he lives, in a town with a fairly high cost of living.) She has a high paying occupational field but chooses to work part-time, he works 3 jobs to cover the bills.

So here is the situation of where he is at now. They split up almost a year ago, he has his own place, and they have shared custody of their child 50/50 since they split. They are going the legal route on the split even though they weren't married because he felt her expectations regarding child support and spousal support were unreasonable.

He has consulted a lawyer and they are close to their court date but he is terrified. In speaking with his lawyer she has told him that depending on the judge she can be awarded as little as 3 years of spousal support or as much as 16 years, all because they lived together for a year. He has done the online calculations for child support and has been paying that plus extra since they split.

I just don't understand how this could be. If you look at it by the hourly wage she makes around 5-6 dollars an hour more than he does and in her chosen field if she chose to work full time she would easily make more than he does working all 3 jobs, jobs that he is working simply to be able to pay her but because he is working them his income goes up and so goes the payment demands.

None of this takes into account that the Lawyer told him that the spousal support could actually be higher than the child support and for as long as 16 years. When he was shopping around for a lawyer, the one he got is considered the best in the area by everyone he spoke to.

How on earth could you be stuck paying spousal support for 16 years because you lived with someone for a year. After hearing that I must say I find it incredible that anybody is willing to take the risk of living with or marrying somebody.

our lives are a novel and we its authors, if you don't like the plot only you can change it.

posts: 123   ·   registered: Jun. 20th, 2016   ·   location: Calgary, AB
id 8602350
default

phmh ( member #34146) posted at 2:26 AM on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020

That doesn't seem right. I hope he gets a consultation with another lawyer. I know it varies by state in the US - not sure which country/state they are in. In my state, spousal support is sometimes offered in long-term marriages (over 16 years) - definitely not for a 1 year cohabitation split. I was told that almost all states are moving away from spousal support as they expect adults to be able to support themselves.

Unless the 16 years is to get the child to 18 because she gave up her high-paying job and moved to a HCL area and can't find a comparable FT job? But that seems like it should be considered child support and not spousal support.

Me: BW, divorced, now fabulous and happy!

Married: 11 years, no kids

Character is destiny

posts: 4993   ·   registered: Dec. 8th, 2011
id 8602389
default

OwningItNow ( member #52288) posted at 2:54 AM on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020

I am very confused on the accuracy of this info. How long was the cohabitation in the new city? Is it possible that he is confusing spousal with straight child support?

me: BS/WS h: WS/BS

Reject the rejector. Do not reject yourself.

posts: 5911   ·   registered: Mar. 16th, 2016   ·   location: Midwest
id 8602402
default

 leftbroken (original poster member #53741) posted at 3:49 AM on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020

That doesn't seem right. I hope he gets a consultation with another lawyer. I know it varies by state in the US - not sure which country/state they are in. In my state, spousal support is sometimes offered in long-term marriages (over 16 years) - definitely not for a 1 year cohabitation split. I was told that almost all states are moving away from spousal support as they expect adults to be able to support themselves.

Unless the 16 years is to get the child to 18 because she gave up her high-paying job and moved to a HCL area and can't find a comparable FT job? But that seems like it should be considered child support and not spousal support

.

Canada, not U.S.

I thought about the confusion of spousal and child support but then realized that wouldn't make sense because then there wouldn't be a low end of 3 years. The lawyer did tell him that the likelihood of him getting the minimum is very high but I still can't believe that the potential for 16 years is there. How on earth could you justify awarding 16 years of spousal support to someone after 1 year of cohabitation.

I always heard that it is basically 1 year of spousal for every 2 years married but once you hit 20 years of marriage it's spousal for life. The fact that he is looking at 3 years seem rediculous to me.

As far as her sacrificing her career to move, its actually the other way around. Her profession is in great demand where they live and very few certified service providers. Her employers have asked her numerous times to go full time but she won't, she limits herself to 20 hours a week.

I keep thinking that there has to be something he is misunderstanding, it just doesnt make sense to me.

our lives are a novel and we its authors, if you don't like the plot only you can change it.

posts: 123   ·   registered: Jun. 20th, 2016   ·   location: Calgary, AB
id 8602421
default

 leftbroken (original poster member #53741) posted at 3:53 AM on Tuesday, October 27th, 2020

I am very confused on the accuracy of this info. How long was the cohabitation in the new city? Is it possible that he is confusing spousal with straight child support?

They lived in different cities when they"hooked up". After they found out she was pregnant they arranged for her to move to where he lived. She moved there shortly before having the baby. So tge full length of their cohabitation was in the new city.

our lives are a novel and we its authors, if you don't like the plot only you can change it.

posts: 123   ·   registered: Jun. 20th, 2016   ·   location: Calgary, AB
id 8602422
default

phmh ( member #34146) posted at 2:38 AM on Wednesday, October 28th, 2020

I keep thinking that there has to be something he is misunderstanding, it just doesnt make sense to me.

Completely agree. I have been on SI for almost 9 years now and I have never heard of anything remotely like this for a short-term relationship. I really hope he checks with another lawyer or clarifies this information before freaking out too much!

Me: BW, divorced, now fabulous and happy!

Married: 11 years, no kids

Character is destiny

posts: 4993   ·   registered: Dec. 8th, 2011
id 8602773
default

Hawke ( member #47517) posted at 11:42 PM on Thursday, October 29th, 2020

First of all, you are getting a second-hand account of what the lawyer said, so take it all with a grain of salt. The lawyer is preparing your nephew for a worst case scenario because judges can make weird decisions. That's why most people settle disputes - they really don't want a wild card judge deciding their futures.

I'm in Canada and separated from my ex in 2016.

The ability to work is not really considered by the courts in calculating child support in the province where I live - it is based on actual income. It is such an uphill battle to try to impute income that it's not worth it to bother trying (ask me how I know...). This varies from province to province, though.

To give you a flavour of an actual outcome: My ex was a SAHD, we lived common law for 7 years and had 2 children together. I paid him spousal support for 3.5 years and it was almost as much as the child support. We settled on what we thought, based on legal advice, would be a typical outcome rather than pay costs of litigating.

Me: BS (b. '75)
Him: exWS (b. '76)
D-Day: April 2015
Together 10 years
2 kids: 2011 and 2014
Separated (no divorce required for common law couple in my jurisdiction)

posts: 2370   ·   registered: Apr. 13th, 2015   ·   location: Alberta, Canada
id 8603464
This Topic is Archived
Cookies on SurvivingInfidelity.com®

SurvivingInfidelity.com® uses cookies to enhance your visit to our website. This is a requirement for participants to login, post and use other features. Visitors may opt out, but the website will be less functional for you.

v.1.001.20250404a 2002-2025 SurvivingInfidelity.com® All Rights Reserved. • Privacy Policy