It would have been nice if he had thought more deeply about, oh, I don't know, YOUR WEDDING VOWS!?!?
Amen to that!
I vote for the "K" - I laughed pretty loud. And then send an exact duplicate of his message next time he needs to make a change.
You just have to, Please?!?!
"The Secret of Change is to focus all your energy - not on fighting the old, but on building the new" ~~Lori Greiner FB post~~
HOWEVER, I will sure as hell edit it better than that so it doesn't sound like I'm using words I don't even know the meaning of or how to use them in appropriate context.
I agree that he is creating a record for the courts. As fun as some of the previous responses would be (my favorite being "k"!), keep that In mind when you reply. Kwim?
Be happy with what you have while you work for what you want - Hellen Keller
I think he really makes himself look stupid
For sure. It's horribly written. My 19 year old would edit the crap out of that.
YES, he is totally trying to create some record of all this via email. Has been for six months now. Early on, I asked my L if I need to try and correct his alternate story line with my own email record...and she said that no judge is going to sit there and read 6 months worth of these crapass emails. Has anyone had that kind of SHIT actually used against them effectively??
SOmetimes I get emails that even show where someone, like his douchy L or his skanky whore OW, else editted them for him...where the text is different font or size. I laugh that he is spending so much of his time and energy on these ridiculous emails that a 12 year old could see through.... and that it is probably really pissing him off that I just don't give a flying F**K and am not the least bit intimadated.
I usually just don't respond at all. I figure that pisses him off the most. I see his little game and it is so transparent it is not worth responding to.
So far, I haven't said anything...but there are some really good options you all posted here for me to choose from!!!
Thank you for the note. Yes, I agree. We will need to come to a mutual agreement on co-parenting practice that will ultimately evolve into a legal parenting plan agreement. I would very much appreciate the opportunity to have a good, open and transparent co-parenting relationship where neither party is seeking to undermine the good, connected parenting time the other is having with the girls. I have also been aware during your allotted time that you have had the girls under the care of 3rd parties that I have no relationship with. During this occurrences, it was not communicated to me that this was taking place as I felt you were using your best judgement.
DD was at a Christian wedding ceremony setting up for the event with a play date I had arranged during my time. DD was under the care of a trusted friend with nearly 3 decades of experience in childhood education and child psychology. In the future, if the girls are not under my direct supervision, I'm happy to share that information of where the girls are and who with as long as you agree to do the same; which has not been your practice to-date.
The agreement made during the early December session with Therapist was that I would not introduce the children to any romantic partner until I felt the time was appropriate. That time is not today. After meeting with you the day before, Therapist made the suggestion in our joint appointment of "not meeting a romantic partner til one year after divorce." I did not agree to that suggestion and said, "I do not know when, but I will introduce the girls to a romantic partner when I feel it is appropriate. At this time, I had shared the attached discussion guide for parenting time. You dismissed the document and erupted during that joint session and said to therapist, "YOU SEE! He won't agree to it." That statement was a strong suggestion that you had built a narrative in your individual session with therapist just prior to the joint session. Therapist further asked, "When will you introduce a romantic partner." I replied, "As I said, I do not know. Maybe after divorce. My answer is the same. Whenever the time is that I feel is an appropriate time for DD1 and DD2, and what is more important right now is that we discuss and agree to the structure of a parenting plan that is in the best interest of the children.
What is more important to me right now is we discuss, progress, and agree to a graduated schedule that leads towards equal parenting time.
You were frustrated that we were discussing parenting time and indicated that you have "five nuclear missiles that will destroy me." At this point, the session completely broke down leading to your suggestion that you have information that would threaten my livelihood; and thus, my ability to provide for the children.
I did not take the children out-of-town this past weekend. Of course I will share information of our whereabouts if I am taking the girls out-of-town. My contact information is always my mobile phone. It also operates as my work and home phone so that I can limit duplicate expenses. When you went to the other weekend that I had the girls, you did not communicate any means of communication beyond your mobile phone. I think that is appropriate for those occasions when one parent does not have the children, and I will act in kind.
Also, I still have not heard back from you concerning the need for us to see a private mediator to discuss division of assets. As we agreed in the last joint therapy session, you were going to communicate a list of names of potential mediators. I have shared since September our need to see a mediator, and most recently provided a list of names in January. The current financial model is unsustainable, so please kindly provide a list of names by the end of this week, and we can coordinate a mutually agreeable time to visit with them ASAP.
He makes my brain hurt. I hope you aren't sore from all the face-palming.
[This message edited by Iamhappytoday at 11:47 AM, March 1st (Saturday)]
SOmetimes I get emails that even show where someone, like his douchy L or his skanky whore OW, else editted them for him...where the text is different font or size.
so that I can limit duplicate expenses
but he will never be able to limit his duplicate douchiness
If you actually read the stuff he writes he always agrees and claims he will do what sleep requested, but he never does. It's like the written version of a square dance.
Delay is the deadliest form of denial. - C. Northcote Parkinson
Your standards aren't up for negotiation just because he/she can't meet them.
It must be some word he picked up from his pretentious pseudo intellectual, higher level of conciousness, you don't own anyone's sexuality, we aspire to greatness and have infinite potential BAT SHIT CRAZY open marriage flakey ass whore OW. Yes, this bitches aperature is always open I am sure....
I either do not respond or email back with "ok."
What a pompous shithead!
I have an even better response than ok. It's "kk" or "k". My DS15 will respond to me in text like that and it used to drive me crazy!! I used to think "YOU CAN'T EVEN TOUCH THE O BEFORE THE K TO TELL ME 'OK'???"
BTW, he won't be able to keep up with these type of responses. His brain WILL explode. Idiot.
Holy man! (As my 99yr old gramma would say!)